Globalization and the myth of collapsing borders

world | Dec 19, 2007 | By Robert Duncan

In the minds of many not only is globalization leading a rush into India and China, but also a collapse of national borders. Such concerns are made more popular by the likes of Pulitzer Prize author and journalist Thomas Friedman who claims that borders are disappearing as a result of a leveling of industrial and emerging market economies, which in turn is making “the world flat.”

But there are sceptics.

The problem with Friedman’s theory is that it is not carried over into real life and “is grossly mis-based,” said Prof. Pankaj Ghemawat, a professor at IESE, a European business school. Ghemawat is the author of various books on globalization, as well as an article published in “Foreign Policy” and the “Wall Street Journal” titled “Why the World Isn’t Flat.” Ghemawat's latest book is "Redefining Global Strategy" (Harvard, $29.95) .

Despite the assumption that borders are coming down, Ghemawat noted that in actuality under 10 percent of all money crosses borders. “This year it might make 12 percent given recent merger activity,” Ghemawat said, but he quickly added that cross-border money flows have never reached 20 percent.

That is not to say that the Tiger and Dragon economies aren’t growing, or that globalization isn’t happening.

“We are in a new era,” said Jan Muhlfeit, Chairman Europe for Microsoft in reference to the current global economic situation now that both the Chinese and Indian economies are on the rise.

Specifically, Muhlfeit said that Europe will have to learn how to manage its demographics in a scenario of lower birth rates.

“As the (European) population declines, that must be met by an increase in productivity and economic competitiveness to protect our current quality of life,” Muhlfeit argued, adding that this can only be done if there is a serious overhaul of Europe’s education systems to meet the market’s demands and ultimately the labor market.

“This is the 21st Century and we are using allocation systems from the 18th,” Muhlfeit said.

But just spending money on education isn’t the answer either, according to Esko Aho, former Prime Minister for Finland, and President of SITRA, the Finnish Innovation Fund.

“Despite all the money spent in Russia on Research and Development, that system collapsed. I think that this is an important lesson for Europe now,” Aho said. “Deciding strategies is relatively easy; it’s another thing implementing them.”

According to Aho, Research and Development is “the transfer of money to knowledge; however innovation is transforming knowledge into money.”

“Please watch out, we are coming,” said Ram Ramakrishnan, Chief Executive Officer for India’s Bajaj Electricals. “If you want hands and feet, go to China. But if you want hands and feet that have a brain, then come to India,” Ramakrishan said in reference to his country’s high percentage of engineers and doctors.

Ramakrishnan argued that cost does have a factor for those companies wishing to operate in India. “To develop a drug can be as little as 100 million dollars in India, compared to 1 billion dollars in the rest of the world.”

But that exuberance needs to be cast upon the backdrop that the number of companies that are truly global is actually quite small.

As an example, Ghemawat suggested a yardstick for measuring if companies were actually global - that 20 percent of a company’s sales must be in at least three countries.

Using this measure, Ghemawat said that only 2 percent of all Fortune 500 companies are qualified to be



SHARE

Short Link

Robert Steven Duncan is a consultant and a widely published foreign correspondent who lives in Spain. Besides having articles appearing in WSJ, Barron's, Smart Money, Newsweek, the National Catholic Register and many other places, he has held various leadership posts in the communication sector. He publishes the "RSD Report" at http://www.robertstevenduncan.com

The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author only, not of Spero News.

Comments

RELATED NEWS