Addressing the Council on Foreign Relations in New York on November 4, el-Baradei had some advice. He reminded his audience that there is no indication and no concrete proof that Iran has an active nuclear weapons program.
Iran has developed nuclear "weaponization" studies, but not the weapon itself, he said, and that program was apparently halted back in 2003.
But what is important to understand, according to el-Baradei, is why Tehran is pursuing a nuclear program at all. And that has much to do with prestige and getting respect.
"Iran's program is an effort to force recognition of its role as a regional power," el-Baradei said.
sponsored by
India?s all-female UN police unit serves as inspiration for Liberian women
Liberian girls and women should draw inspiration from the all-female Indian police unit serving with the United Nations Mission in Liberia (UNMIL) to join law enforcement agencies in the service of their own nation, the top UN official in the West African country said today.
Ensuring child rights still a challenge, 20 years after landmark treaty - UN officials
The Convention on the Rights of the Child has become the most widely accepted human rights treaty in history, but 20 years after its adoption, much more remains to be done to turn its promises into reality for millions worldwide, top United Nations officials said today.
The United States, Britain, France, Russia, and China -- all five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council -- and Germany have repeatedly tried to persuade Iran to halt its own uranium enrichment, although they differ on strategy.
Taking Iran Seriously
Fortunately or unfortunately, el-Baradei said, there is some truth to the fact that Iran has been taken more seriously by the West since developing a nuclear program.
But he said a saw a "unique" opportunity, after years of animosity between the West and Iran, to try for a fresh start. "I see a genuine desire on both sides to seriously engage not only on the nuclear issue, but on the broad range of issues," he said.
El-Baradei said he believed Iran could actually play a stabilizing role in the Middle East if Tehran felt that its demands had been acknowledged and respected by the West. He also noted the opposite would happen if Tehran felt cornered or ignored.
"Iran could be the door to a stable Middle East in Iraq, in Afghanistan, in Syria, Lebanon, in the Palestinian territories. And also it could be a source of aggravation of the situation," el-Baradei said.
"Iran needs the U.S. badly in terms of technology, in terms of integration, trade, what have you. So, how to get the two powers engaged?"
El-Baradei gave as an example a proposal to supply nuclear fuel to Iran for its research reactor, which is being used for medical purposes, providing isotopes for the diagnosis and treatment of cancers. He said that could be a perfect way to start a dialogue.
'You Can't Bomb Knowledge'
Asked whether bombing Iran's nuclear facilities might be the ultimate solution to the problem, el-Baradei said that the maximum result from such a move would be to delay the development of Iran's nuclear program for two years. But he warned that this could also turn the Middle East into a "wall of fire."
"You cannot bomb knowledge, as I have been saying. The knowledge is there, the technology is there," he said, "all [bombing] would do is get Iran -- even if they don't want to get nuclear weapons -- to go for a crash course to develop a nuclear weapon with the support of every single Iranian including the 1 million Iranians living in Los Angeles. Because there is a difference between loving my country and hating the regime."
El-Baradei expressed regret for missed opportunities to find common ground. He said that there was a point when Iranians were prepared to halt their enrichment program but he blamed the previous U.S. administration for showing inflexibility.
He argued that the United States, together with Britain, France, and Germany, missed an opportunity to end the standoff by imposing unrealistic conditions on Iran.
RSS