Left's double-standard on religion and abortion

The Left opposes the Catholic Church's opposition to abortion provisions in healthcare reform. So why doesn't it oppose the YWCA, United Methodist Church, and the Central Conference of American Rabbis for favoring abortion?

Article Tools

Getting Nancy Pelosi to accept a health care bill that bans federal funds for abortion was the greatest victory scored by U.S. bishops in a generation. It also unleashed an unprecedented attempt to censor them. Their latest enemy is Geoffrey Stone writing in the Huffington Post.

Stone finds it troubling that the bishops are so vocal. He yearns for a time when JFK was president, a time when separation of church and state met his approval. Perhaps the Chicago law professor forgot about Rev. Martin Luther King, the minister who took to the pulpit and lobbied for civil rights in the name of free speech and religious liberty. Should King have been muzzled as well? Or just today’s bishops?

As the following list discloses, Stone is hardly alone in trying to censor the bishops: Rep. Lynn Woolsey, Rep. Diana DeGette, Rep. Patrick Kennedy, Frances Kissling, Planned Parenthood, Feminist Majority, Catholics for Choice, Americans United for Separation of Church and State, the National Organization for Women, and many others favor a gag rule. On Nov. 12, Nancy Snyderman of MSNBC spoke for many when she said that “This is going to be a Pollyannaish statement. The Catholic bishops appearing and having a political voice seems to be a most fundamental violation of church and state.” Brilliant.

The following is a partial list of religious groups that want abortion coverage in the health care bill: Rabbinical Assembly, Women’s League for Conservative Judaism, Episcopal Church, Society for Humanistic Judaism, Jewish Reconstructionist Federation, Union for Reform Judaism, Central Conference of American Rabbis, North American Federation of Temple Youth, United Church of Christ, United Methodist Church, Unitarian Universalist, Presbyterian Church (USA), Women of Reform Judaism, Society for Humanistic Judaism, Church of the Brethren Women’s Caucus, Reconstructionist Rabbinical Association, Lutheran Women’s Caucus, Christian Lesbians Out, YWCA.

So why don’t Stone and company want to gag these groups as well? Let’s face it: they don’t have a principled bone in their collective bodies.



William Donohue is president o
The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author only, not of Spero News.
Add to Newsvine Add to Facebook Add to Digg Add to Twitter Add to DeliciousAdd to PropellerAdd to TechnoratiAdd to StumbleUponAdd to FurlAdd to BlinklistAdd to FarkAdd to Reddit
Opinion RSS
Comments
If someone does not oppose abortion, then they favor it in the sense that they feel it is an acceptable method to deal with an unplanned pregnancy. Actually, on January 1st, those who favor/accept abortion essentially say, "I don't plan on getting pregnant, but if I do, luckily I'll have the ability to kill that unborn as a back-up plan."

Anyone who engages in sex knows that they have the possiblity of getting pregnant, so the idea that a pregnancy is somehow something out of their control is the biggest lie of the pro-choice side. The choice exists to not have sex and to avoid that unplanned pregnancy. Murder of unborns is not healthcare, it is not birth control and it is not a right.

by Anti-Farmer Tom | Wednesday, November 18, 2009  6:55:03 AM

The Church of the Brethren Women’s Caucus does not represent the Church of the Brethren denominational position on abortion which is against abortion.

by gemiller | Saturday, November 14, 2009  7:43:26 PM

Bill would have a point, but his point is spoiled by the kicker of the piece, and I quote:"The Left opposes the Catholic Church's opposition to abortion provisions in healthcare reform. So why doesn't it oppose the YWCA, United Methodist Church, and the Central Conference of American Rabbis for favoring abortion?"
See, Bill, you and all the other guys on your side of the fence, along with the twits who won't say "Democratic", lose points in the sandbox for lying or misleading or whatever you want to call it, when you say that so-and-so "FAVORS ABORTIONS". It's not true, it's never true, and you know it. Favoring the right to an abortion is NOT the same as favoring abortion. No one says, on Jan 1st, gosh, this year I hope I have an unplanned pregnancy so I can get an abortion."
Were it not for that, your piece here would actually have been spot on.

by Farmer Tom | Saturday, November 14, 2009  7:34:36 AM

Your E-mail Address:

Privacy Statement
 


© Copyright Spero, All rights reserved. RSS
Spero News on Twitter
Spero News on Google Buzz
Submit a tip
Advertise
Terms of use
Privacy Policy
Contact
This page took 0.1992seconds to load