| T O P I C R E V I E W |
| God4me |
Posted - 03/13/2012 : 11:52:13
Why do catholics light candles for the dead, And why do they say prayers for the dead.
And why do they do penance/works for the dead.
Does anyone know??. |
| 15 L A T E S T R E P L I E S (Newest First) |
| bwellmysoul |
Posted - 04/12/2012 : 12:26:28
Oneness Pentecostalism is the leading form of Pentecostalism in Mexico.
Evangelical and Pentecostal support of birth control is probably the underlying drawing force in Mexico.
As the Southern Baptist Dean of Theology Russel Moore wrote, “perhaps American Evangelicalism unwittingly traded the Blessed Virgin Mary for Margaret Sanger.”
|
| jdubya |
Posted - 04/12/2012 : 09:39:30
quote:
Originally posted by God4me
quote:
Originally posted by bwellmysoul
quote:
Originally posted by God4me
The, "So-called Mary", Is the So-called Mary that suposed to have appeared to people over the years.
When it wasn't Mary, It was demon .
Really...a demon appeard in Mexico and converted 8 million believers from the Aztec faith to Catholicism?
Again G4Me, are you beginning to realize how rediculous your accusations sound?
Remember Jesus' words to those who accused Him of being from the devil?
"Can a demon cast out demons?" "A house divided against itself will fall."
It had to be a demon in Mexico, To convert 8 million fools to catholicism.
It certainly wasn't from God.
So there was no net gain for the devil? What a waste of the devil's time to convert heathens who sacrifice humans daily to Catholicism. The devil must have been bored eh? To further confuse, he wanted a church built to worship Jesus.
I guess God really doesn't want all to be saved.
Where were the Pentacostals?
I guess the same thing happened in Ireland in the 5th century, when St. Patrick converted a country full of druid pagans to the Christian (Catholic) faith. What was the devil's gain?
Again, where were the Pentacostals? Either they didn't exist (which is the case) or they were so hidden under a bushel basket in a tiny corner of the earth that they couldn't accomplish a thing for the kingdom. All the while, the Catholic Church was/is bringing the Gospel to the ends of the earth in keeping with Christ's commission.
Are there any limits on how ridiculous can you get? Are you sure you want to keep following this train of nonsensical lunacy?
|
| God4me |
Posted - 04/12/2012 : 08:00:20
quote:
Originally posted by bwellmysoul
quote:
Originally posted by God4me
quote:
Originally posted by bwellmysoul
quote:
Originally posted by God4me
The, "So-called Mary", Is the So-called Mary that suposed to have appeared to people over the years.
When it wasn't Mary, It was demon .
Really...a demon appeard in Mexico and converted 8 million believers from the Aztec faith to Catholicism?
Again G4Me, are you beginning to realize how rediculous your accusations sound?
Remember Jesus' words to those who accused Him of being from the devil?
"Can a demon cast out demons?" "A house divided against itself will fall."
It had to be a demon in Mexico, To convert 8 million fools to catholicism.
It certainly wasn't from God.
Naughty naughty G4Me, you must have glanced over and quickly forgotten your Bible and what Jesus said about calling other people "fools".
What has a demon casting out a demon got to do with the demons who deceives millions into the eroneous catholic faith??.
The devil will do miracles to decieve people.
Jesus never said "can a demon cast out a demon".
He said,
"Satan cast out satan".There is a difference,
Satan [the devil], can put sickness on people and he can put demons in people.
he can also take them out to deceive people into believing the catholic church is the true church.
So, Once again you have misquoted and misinterpreted scripture. |
| bwellmysoul |
Posted - 04/12/2012 : 07:18:13
quote:
Originally posted by God4me
quote:
Originally posted by bwellmysoul
quote:
Originally posted by God4me
The, "So-called Mary", Is the So-called Mary that suposed to have appeared to people over the years.
When it wasn't Mary, It was demon .
Really...a demon appeard in Mexico and converted 8 million believers from the Aztec faith to Catholicism?
Again G4Me, are you beginning to realize how rediculous your accusations sound?
Remember Jesus' words to those who accused Him of being from the devil?
"Can a demon cast out demons?" "A house divided against itself will fall."
It had to be a demon in Mexico, To convert 8 million fools to catholicism.
It certainly wasn't from God.
Naughty naughty G4Me, you must have glanced over and quickly forgotten your Bible and what Jesus said about calling other people "fools". |
| God4me |
Posted - 04/11/2012 : 23:33:25
quote:
Originally posted by bwellmysoul
quote:
Originally posted by God4me
The, "So-called Mary", Is the So-called Mary that suposed to have appeared to people over the years.
When it wasn't Mary, It was demon .
Really...a demon appeard in Mexico and converted 8 million believers from the Aztec faith to Catholicism?
Again G4Me, are you beginning to realize how rediculous your accusations sound?
Remember Jesus' words to those who accused Him of being from the devil?
"Can a demon cast out demons?" "A house divided against itself will fall."
It had to be a demon in Mexico, To convert 8 million fools to catholicism.
It certainly wasn't from God. |
| bwellmysoul |
Posted - 04/11/2012 : 14:09:54
quote:
Originally posted by God4me
The, "So-called Mary", Is the So-called Mary that suposed to have appeared to people over the years.
When it wasn't Mary, It was demon .
Really...a demon appeard in Mexico and converted 8 million believers from the Aztec faith to Catholicism?
Again G4Me, are you beginning to realize how rediculous your accusations sound?
Remember Jesus' words to those who accused Him of being from the devil?
"Can a demon cast out demons?" "A house divided against itself will fall."
|
| bwellmysoul |
Posted - 04/11/2012 : 13:57:53
quote:
Originally posted by God4me
quote:
Originally posted by bwellmysoul
P.S. Still waiting on your proof that the Catholic Church is teaching, preaching and believing 34,000 seperate branches of Catholicism.
I found it on the internet, So if you want it, Look for yourself. YOU BONE IDLE MAN.
Yet, you can't locate the web address and share it here.
... pants on fire. |
| bwellmysoul |
Posted - 04/11/2012 : 13:56:08
quote:
Originally posted by baby3
Does anyone have a book on Tobin I can borrow and I will send it back? Let ,me know Thank YOU! B3
Book of Tobit?
Introduction to Tobit:
http://www.usccb.org/bible/tobit/0
The Book of Tobit:
http://www.usccb.org/bible/tobit/1/ |
| baby3 |
Posted - 04/07/2012 : 18:54:15
Does anyone have a book on Tobin I can borrow and I will send it back? Let ,me know Thank YOU! B3 |
| God4me |
Posted - 04/06/2012 : 00:01:00
quote:
Originally posted by bwellmysoul
quote:
Jesus said no one will believe if a departed person come back and tells them somthing,So why do catholics believe manifestations of the so-called departded saints and the so-called Mary??.
"...the so-called Mary?"
Are you daring to be disrespectful of Jesus' mother?
The, "So-called Mary", Is the So-called Mary that suposed to have appeared to people over the years.
When it wasn't Mary, It was demon . |
| God4me |
Posted - 04/05/2012 : 23:58:43
quote:
Originally posted by mikejuli
quote:
1)If God forbids comunications with the departed, [And He does], Why do catholics teach it??
god doesn't forbid praying to saints. he does forbid necromancy and conjuring or controling spirits. big difference.
quote:
2)Jesus said no one will believe if a departed person come back and tells them somthing,So why do catholics believe manifestations of the so-called departded saints and the so-called Mary??.
i would note the people jesus was talking about there. who wouldn't believe such a thing? well the people that didn't believe moses and the prophets. this actually support my position...
quote:
So,The practice wasn't taught in the Christian doctrine.
You are practicing evil doctrines.
looks like it was practiced very early on in christianity and that the practice goes right back to jewish times when they would pray for their dead. we see jesus conversing with moses and elijah, we hear that the voice of rachel was heard weeping for her chilren, we see people assuming jesus was calling on elijah to help him. we see angels being sent to convey messages and having actual conversations with people.
quote:
3)You haven't given me Biblical examples, You HAVE twisted the Bible to make it say what you want it to say.
nope that's your tactic not mine.
quote:
4)You have a cheek to say I lack proof when I give you scriptures for what I say,
When you either don't give scriptures, Or when you do, You twist them.
i say you lack proof because you lack proof. either provide solid proof in accordance with your own criteria or back off. i'm only holding you to the same standard you hold others. if you cannot handle it don't whine to me.
quote:
5)You are twisting Mk 15: 34--36, You are making a false docrine out of some people's thinking that Jesus was calling for Elijah.
STOP TELLING LIES.
no i'm not. it's right there. why would they be saying such a thing if they didn't think that was what was going on? the bible records this as happening and its the only logical way it could be understood. they thought he was calling on elijah. they didn't call him a blasphemer for doing so. that they even mention the thing implies that it was a practice otherwise how would they have even mentioned it as possible?
quote:
6)The Bible doesn't teach infant baptism, The Bible teaches that a person has to Know, Believe, accept, Repent and get born again to be saved.
How can an infant, know, Believe, accept and repent???..WAKE UP.
Can't you see how you are making a doctrine that isn't Biblical??.
the bible doesn't teach being slain in the spirit and yet you believe that. wake up yourself.
[qutoe]7)Infant baptism, praying to the dead or praying for the dead, Or the dead praying for us, Aren't found in the Bible, So you have no rights to teach those false doctrines.
and you have no rights to your false doctrines about being slain in the spirit. again you are a hypocrite. i don't need to take you seriously because you don't take yourself seriously. if you did then you would stand by your own beliefs and reject being slain in the spirit for the pagan spiritual masturbation it really is.
quote:
Can't you see how you accept and believe the catholic councils and canons above the Bible??.
well since we got the bible from such councils i don't see the problem catholic believe isn't opposed to the bible g4. even the bible records a council in acts..
quote:
That is because the catholic com-men have deceived you into believing catholics have the aunhority to change the truth.
nope. your the con man. and so far i don't think anyone is falling for your con.
[/quote]
All I can say to that load of rubbish is,
STOP TELLING LIES..AND.
STOP TWISTING THE SCRIPTURES. |
| God4me |
Posted - 04/05/2012 : 23:55:47
quote:
Originally posted by bwellmysoul
P.S. Still waiting on your proof that the Catholic Church is teaching, preaching and believing 34,000 seperate branches of Catholicism.
I found it on the internet, So if you want it, Look for yourself. YOU BONE IDLE MAN. |
| God4me |
Posted - 04/05/2012 : 23:54:22
quote:
Originally posted by bwellmysoul
G4,
Enormous difference between "conjuring up the dead" - which is called necromancy - and praying in intercession with the souls of Jesus' saints.
God comes against speaking to the dead, And no where in the Bible's new testament Church, do you see people praying to the dead or the dead praying for the people.
So why do you make a doctrine out of it??. |
| bwellmysoul |
Posted - 04/04/2012 : 11:42:32
quote:
Jesus said no one will believe if a departed person come back and tells them somthing,So why do catholics believe manifestations of the so-called departded saints and the so-called Mary??.
"...the so-called Mary?"
Are you daring to be disrespectful of Jesus' mother?
|
| mikejuli |
Posted - 04/04/2012 : 11:38:36
quote:
1)If God forbids comunications with the departed, [And He does], Why do catholics teach it??
god doesn't forbid praying to saints. he does forbid necromancy and conjuring or controling spirits. big difference.
quote:
2)Jesus said no one will believe if a departed person come back and tells them somthing,So why do catholics believe manifestations of the so-called departded saints and the so-called Mary??.
i would note the people jesus was talking about there. who wouldn't believe such a thing? well the people that didn't believe moses and the prophets. this actually support my position...
quote:
So,The practice wasn't taught in the Christian doctrine.
You are practicing evil doctrines.
looks like it was practiced very early on in christianity and that the practice goes right back to jewish times when they would pray for their dead. we see jesus conversing with moses and elijah, we hear that the voice of rachel was heard weeping for her chilren, we see people assuming jesus was calling on elijah to help him. we see angels being sent to convey messages and having actual conversations with people.
quote:
3)You haven't given me Biblical examples, You HAVE twisted the Bible to make it say what you want it to say.
nope that's your tactic not mine.
quote:
4)You have a cheek to say I lack proof when I give you scriptures for what I say,
When you either don't give scriptures, Or when you do, You twist them.
i say you lack proof because you lack proof. either provide solid proof in accordance with your own criteria or back off. i'm only holding you to the same standard you hold others. if you cannot handle it don't whine to me.
quote:
5)You are twisting Mk 15: 34--36, You are making a false docrine out of some people's thinking that Jesus was calling for Elijah.
STOP TELLING LIES.
no i'm not. it's right there. why would they be saying such a thing if they didn't think that was what was going on? the bible records this as happening and its the only logical way it could be understood. they thought he was calling on elijah. they didn't call him a blasphemer for doing so. that they even mention the thing implies that it was a practice otherwise how would they have even mentioned it as possible?
quote:
6)The Bible doesn't teach infant baptism, The Bible teaches that a person has to Know, Believe, accept, Repent and get born again to be saved.
How can an infant, know, Believe, accept and repent???..WAKE UP.
Can't you see how you are making a doctrine that isn't Biblical??.
the bible doesn't teach being slain in the spirit and yet you believe that. wake up yourself.
[qutoe]7)Infant baptism, praying to the dead or praying for the dead, Or the dead praying for us, Aren't found in the Bible, So you have no rights to teach those false doctrines.
and you have no rights to your false doctrines about being slain in the spirit. again you are a hypocrite. i don't need to take you seriously because you don't take yourself seriously. if you did then you would stand by your own beliefs and reject being slain in the spirit for the pagan spiritual masturbation it really is.
quote:
Can't you see how you accept and believe the catholic councils and canons above the Bible??.
well since we got the bible from such councils i don't see the problem catholic believe isn't opposed to the bible g4. even the bible records a council in acts..
quote:
That is because the catholic com-men have deceived you into believing catholics have the aunhority to change the truth.
[/quote]
nope. your the con man. and so far i don't think anyone is falling for your con. |
|
|
Subscribe by Email
RSS