Spero Forum - Baptist, Protestant, and Catholic Discussion
Username: Password: Save Password Forgot your Password?
Spero Forum - Baptist, Protestant, and Catholic Discussion

Nihil Obstat & Imprimatur

    • 111reputation
    • 10732 Posts
    First Member  
    Contact:  PM
    Member since 05/10/2002
    Location: USA
    View alcovey's full profile or recent posts
What I'm reading/watching/listening to now.
Posted on 11/21/2004 at 01:15:16  |  Reply  |  Report Abuse |  0
Have you ever seen these terms at the beginning of a Catholic Book and wondered what it meant?

What made me think of this is that I noticed that Catholic Answers now has a NIHIL OBSTAT and IMPRIMATUR on all their tracts - which is really good.

For those who didn't know, here is what that is all about:

They are, of course, Latin terms.


Nihil Obstat - Latin, 'Nothing Hinders'

1. nihil obstat - the phrase used by the official censor of the Roman Catholic Church to say that a publication has been examined and contains nothing offensive to the Church



Imprimatur - Latin, 'Let It Be Printed'

Imprimatur is Latin for "let it be printed." When a Roman Catholic bishop grants his imprimatur to a printed work, he assures the reader that nothing therein is contrary to Catholic faith or morals. This imprimatur is not given lightly; only after a thorough review process.
In true dialogue, both sides are willing to change. ~ Thich Nhat Hanh

Catholic Links | Catechism | RCIA | Politics, Etc.
from the community...
    • Adminreputation
    • 10323 Posts
    Forum Admin  
    Contact:  Click to see Astralis's MSN Messenger address  PM
    Member since 07/25/2001
    Location: USA
    View Astralis's full profile or recent posts
What I'm reading/watching/listening to now.
Posted on 11/21/2004 at 04:25:07  |  Reply  |  Report Abuse |  0
But be careful, this does not mean that what is printed is true nor guarantees nothing in terms of orthodoxy. An Imprimatur and Nihil Obstat means that the work is not in error regarding the Faith. It does not rule that it is the Church teaching on the matter, though. I could print: cats are blue. That is not contrary to the Church and could therefore get a NO and I if I'm writing a Catholic work. What blue cats would have to do with Catholicism is a different matter but it's an illustration only.

The Nihil Obstat and Imprimatur are not part of the infallible charism of the Church. They are issued by individual bishops and are a useful tool but relying on them would be like listening to one bishop say pro-abortion politicians can't take the Eucharist, and another one saying the politican can take the Eucharist. They also can easily be revoked and have been revoked in the past.

What is nice about the NO and I on catholic.com is that the site tries to present true Catholic doctrine. I have noticed within the past few months before those marks were posted on the articles, there were MANY changes, some subtle, some obvious, to the articles. I think the Bishop might have used a lot of red ink before those marks were given. At the least, it shows that it was actually read by an ecclesiastical authority whereas some books have been proven to not ever have been read but still received the marks.
"Look on the bright side, if this is the best they've got around here, in six months we'll be running this planet." (Planet of the Apes)
Go to Top of Page
    • 111reputation
    • 10732 Posts
    First Member  
    Contact:  PM
    Member since 05/10/2002
    Location: USA
    View alcovey's full profile or recent posts
What I'm reading/watching/listening to now.
Posted on 11/21/2004 at 10:06:39  |  Reply  |  Report Abuse |  0
Good points. That is a similar idea to 'approved' miracles and apparitions of the Church. It is a 'negative' approval in that it is not a guarantee, but rather nothing contrary to faith, fraudulent or demonic has been found that would be damaging to Catholic piety.

It does seem like a very positive step for Catholic Answers to go through this process. I've heard of some liberal priests that actually take delight in the fact that there is NO Nihil Obstat or Impramatur on their books - Fr. Richard McBrien, I believe, said that.

This makes me wonder, though - do you know if the use of the N.O and Imprimatur are a bit archaic? Do most Catholic authors go through this process? Just a cursory look shows that some do and some don't.

This seems to be a common disclaimer:

"The Nihil Obstat and Imprimatur are official declarations that the work contains nothing contrary to Catholic Faith or Morals. It is not implied thereby that those granting the Nihil Obstat and Imprimatur agree with the contents, statements, or opinions expressed."
In true dialogue, both sides are willing to change. ~ Thich Nhat Hanh

Catholic Links | Catechism | RCIA | Politics, Etc.
Go to Top of Page
    • 111reputation
    • 10732 Posts
    First Member  
    Contact:  PM
    Member since 05/10/2002
    Location: USA
    View alcovey's full profile or recent posts
What I'm reading/watching/listening to now.
Posted on 11/28/2004 at 20:14:26  |  Reply  |  Report Abuse |  0
Jimmy Akin of Catholic Answers made a comment recently that brought up whether a local parish should have independent Bible Studies and use Protestant materials (they were using a John McArthur Study Bible & The Purpose Driven Life for Parish Bible Studies). He mentioned that any Parish sanctioned Study, according to Canon Law, should contain an Imprimatur.

The Magisterium's Imprimatur by FR. WILLIAM SAUNDERS
quote:

Q: I have often noticed in Catholic books "imprimatur" and "nihil obstat." What do these terms mean? Do they show that a book teaches what the Church teaches?
-----------
A: Before addressing the terms themselves, we must remember that the Magisterium, the teaching authority of our Church, has the duty to "preserve God’s people from deviations and defections, and to guarantee them the objective possibility of professing the true faith without error" (Catechism, No. 890). Therefore, under the guidance of the Holy Spirit, whom our Lord called the Spirit of Truth, the Magisterium preserves, understands, teaches and proclaims the truth which leads to salvation.

With this in mind, the Magisterium will examine those works, particularly books, on faith and morals and pronounce whether they are free from doctrinal error. On March 19, 1975, the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith issued the following norms in this matter: "The Pastors of the Church have the duty and the right to be vigilant lest the faith and morals of the faithful be harmed by writings; and consequently, even to demand that the publication of writing concerning the faith and morals should be submitted to the Church’s approval, and also to condemn books and writings that attack faith or morals." This mandate was reiterated in the 1983 Code of Canon Law, No. 823.

The review process would then begin with the author submitting the manuscript to the censor deputatus, who is appointed by the bishop or other ecclesiastical authority to make such examinations. If the censor deputatus finds no doctrinal error in the work, he grants a nihil obstat attesting to this. Translated as "nothing stands in the way," the nihil obstat indicates that the manuscript can be safely forwarded to the bishop for his review and decision.

Similarly, a member of a religious community would submit his work to his major superior. If the work is found free of doctrinal error, the major superior grants an imprimi potest, translated as "it is able to be printed." With this approval, the manuscript is then forwarded to the bishop for his review and decision.

If the bishop concurs that the work is free from doctrinal error, he grants an imprimatur. From the Latin imprimere, meaning to impress or to stamp an imprint, imprimatur translates, "let it be printed." Technically, this is the bishop’s official declaration that the book is free from doctrinal error and has been approved for publication by a censor.

Keep in mind that the imprimatur is an official permission pertaining to works written by a member of the Church and not by the official teaching Church, such as a Church council, synod, bishop, etc. The author can seek the imprimatur from his own bishop or from the bishop of the diocese where the work will be published.

While a Catholic author can certainly publish a manuscript without seeking the bishop’s imprimatur, some works require this official approval before they can be used by the faithful. Prayer books for public or private use, and catechisms or other catechetical materials (or their translations) require the bishop’s permission for publication (Code of Canon Law, No. 826, 827.1). Books related to Sacred Scripture, theology, canon law, Church history, or religious or moral disciplines cannot be used as textbooks in education at a
In true dialogue, both sides are willing to change. ~ Thich Nhat Hanh

Catholic Links | Catechism | RCIA | Politics, Etc.
Go to Top of Page
Posted on 11/28/2004 at 20:20:23  |  Reply  |  Report Abuse |  0
quote:
Originally posted by alcovey
(they were using ... The Purpose Driven Life for Parish Bible Studies).
Didn't you tell me Rick Warren was from Saddleback? Can't wait to see AnH's reaction to this...
Go to Top of Page
    • 111reputation
    • 10732 Posts
    First Member  
    Contact:  PM
    Member since 05/10/2002
    Location: USA
    View alcovey's full profile or recent posts
What I'm reading/watching/listening to now.
Posted on 11/28/2004 at 22:16:39  |  Reply  |  Report Abuse |  0
Maybe it was Lynne's parish!
In true dialogue, both sides are willing to change. ~ Thich Nhat Hanh

Catholic Links | Catechism | RCIA | Politics, Etc.
Go to Top of Page
What I'm reading/watching/listening to now.
Posted on 11/29/2004 at 05:24:05  |  Reply  |  Report Abuse |  0
quote:

About a year ago, the US Bishops issued a warning about the 'Left Behind' Series of books - and a Protestant gal I was dialoguing with had a huge problem with this. She felt that it was censorship in the extreme. I pointed out to her that the Bishops, as good shepherds of the flock, had a duty to warn the faithful, and that I agreed with their decision to do so.

Of course, this kind of thing rubs Evangelicals the wrong way, as their whole system is based on private and independent study.




yeah, based on that and the left behind series. ;) seriously though the rapture and end times really are a major driving force in evangelical circles..

mike
The truth does not change according to our ability to stomach it.
Flannery O'Connor
Go to Top of Page
    • 111reputation
    • 10732 Posts
    First Member  
    Contact:  PM
    Member since 05/10/2002
    Location: USA
    View alcovey's full profile or recent posts
What I'm reading/watching/listening to now.
Posted on 11/29/2004 at 07:48:23  |  Reply  |  Report Abuse |  0
Premillenialism is a dangerous heresy.

And it is rampant in many circles and the cause of much endless speculations and paranoia.

The Creed says: "He will come again in glory to judge the living and the dead, and his kingdom will have no end."

Not "He will secretly come and rapture out many, leave the hard times for the Jews and then come again to set up an earthly reign for a thousand years."

I really believe that kind of fiction is dangerous, because beneath the story line is the presumption that it is based on truth.
In true dialogue, both sides are willing to change. ~ Thich Nhat Hanh

Catholic Links | Catechism | RCIA | Politics, Etc.
Go to Top of Page
Posted on 11/29/2004 at 16:28:36  |  Reply  |  Report Abuse |  0
AMEN and AMEN Allen!!!!
Go to Top of Page

Newest Topics

by alcovey...

 

Recent Topics

3 replies
4 replies
 

Newest Updates

45 replies
3 replies
Jump To:
Spero Forum - Baptist, Protestant, and Catholic Discussion © 2002-2010 Spero Subscribe by Email RSS Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000