spirit ,soul, and body!
-
-
First Member
   
Contact:
PM
Member since 07/10/2003
Location: Germany
I have taught on this truth and teaching so many times and I find this is not taught in many churches and would like to get others views on this important topic!I give a very good example and teaching example with curtains explaning about our born again spirits , and how more...
I may or may not believe coming forward is a necessary condition for salvation. But, if I clearly taught elsewhere that repentance/belief alone was sufficient no one would think coming forward is necessary for salvation,or water baptism is necessary for salvation.
-
-
Contact:
PM
Member since 07/10/2003
Location: Germany
[quote]Originally posted by evangelist
[
So FAITH are you agreeing what I bold in color about those many sciptures about our righteousness and about how we became sinners without doing any sins, and how we became righteous without doing righteous things or commandmend memnts and laws to be Holy Justified, pure, righteous,and sons of God?
Remember the bold red is for sinners and the blue bold is for born again righteous christians!
Ro:5:14: Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over after the similitude of Adam's transgression, who is the figure of him that was to come. Ro:5:15: But not as the offence, so also is the free gift. For if through the offence of one many be dead, much more the grace of God, and the gift by grace, which is by one man, Jesus Christ, hath abounded unto many. Ro:5:16: And not as it was by one that sinned, so is the gift: for the judgment was by one to condemnation, but the free gift is of many offences unto justification.Ro:5:17: For if by one man's offence death reigned by one; much more they which receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness shall reign in life by one, Jesus Christ.)
Notice it all about a gift, not about any obedience or disobedience of any commandment or about any sins we do, plus if any sins was done these scriptures are pointing to Adams and Eve sin, and Jesus righteousness and perfection as a gift towards make kind as believers!
Ro:5:18: Therefore as by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life.
In this verse above is wy all unbelievers will go to hell with thier sins forgivem!
Ro:5:19: For as by one man's disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous.Ro:5:20: Moreover the law entered, that the offence might abound. But where sin abounded, grace did much more abound:
If you can understand what is the understand of MADE in the texts it will blow away your catholic religious spirit!
Ro:5:21: That as sin hath reigned unto death, even so might grace reign through righteousness unto eternal life by Jesus Christ our Lord.
one love
I may or may not believe coming forward is a necessary condition for salvation. But, if I clearly taught elsewhere that repentance/belief alone was sufficient no one would think coming forward is necessary for salvation,or water baptism is necessary for salvation.
Edited by evangelist on 05/14/2012 02:39:59
-
-
Contact:
PM
Member since 01/25/2012
Location: USA
It’s Not Over ‘til It’s Over By: Tim Staples
quote: Romans 5:1 is a favorite verse for those who hold to the doctrine commonly known as "once saved, always saved": "Therefore, since we are justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ."
This text is believed to indicate that the justification of the believer in Christ at the point of faith is a one-time completed action.
For the once saved–always saved believer, all sins are forgiven immediately—past, present, and future.
The believer then has, or at least, can have, absolute assurance of his justification regardless of what may happen in the future.
Nothing can separate the true believer from Christ—not even the gravest of sins.
Similarly, with regard to salvation, Ephesians 2:8-9 says: "For by grace you have been saved through faith; and this is not your own doing, it is the gift of God—not because of works, lest any man should boast."
For the Protestant, these texts seem plain.
Ephesians 2 says the salvation of the believer is past—perfect tense, passive voice in Greek, to be more precise—which means a past completed action with present, ongoing results.
In other words, it’s over.
And if we examine again Romans 5:1, the verb justify is in a simple past tense (Greek Aorist tense).
And this use is in a context where St. Paul had just told these Romans: "For if Abraham was justified by works, he has something to boast about, but not before God. For what does the scripture say? ‘Abraham believed God, and it was reckoned to him as righteousness’" (Rom. 4:3).
Righteousness is a synonym for justice or justification.
How does it get any plainer than that? Abraham was justified once and for all when he believed. Not only is this proof of sola fide, says the Calvinist, but it is proof that justification is a completed transaction at the point the believer comes to Christ. The paradigm of the life of Abraham is believed to hold indisputable proof of the Reformed position.
Continue in the Grace of God
The Catholic Church actually agrees with this interpretation, at least on a couple of points.
First, as baptized Catholics, we can agree that we have been justified and we have been saved. Thus, in one sense, our justification and salvation is in the past as a completed action. The initial grace of justification and salvation we receive in baptism is a done deal. And Catholics do not believe we were partially justified or partially saved at baptism.
Catholics believe, as Peter says in 1 Peter 3:21, "Baptism… now saves you…" Ananias said to Saul of Tarsus, "Rise and be baptized, and wash away your sins, calling on his name" (Acts 22:16).
That means the new Christian has been "washed… sanctified… [and] justified" as 1 Corinthians 6:11 remarks.
That much is a done deal; thus, it is entirely proper to say we "have been justified" and we "have been saved."
However, this is not the end of the story.
Scripture reveals that through this justification and salvation the new Christian experiences in baptism, he enters into a process of justification and salvation requiring his free cooperation with God’s grace.
If we read the very next verses of our above-cited texts, we find the writer telling us there is more to the story.
Romans 5:1-2 states, "Therefore, since we are justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ. Through him we have obtained access to this grace in which we stand, and we rejoice in our hope of sharing the glory of God."
This text indicates that after having received the grace of justification, we now have access to God’s grace by which we stand in Christ, and we can then rejoice in the hope of sharing God’s glory. That word hope indicates that what we are hoping for we do not yet possess.
"For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them" (Eph. 2:10).
Without a doubt, we must continue to work in Christ as Christians; it is also true that it is only by the grace of God we can continue to do so.
But even more importantly, Scripture tells us this grace can be resisted.
Second Corinthians 6:1 tells us that "Working together with him, then, we entreat you not to accept the grace of God in vain."
St. Paul urged believers in Antioch—and all of us by implication—"to continue in the grace of God."
Indeed, Paul warns Christians that they can "fall from grace" in Galatians 5:4. This leads us to our next and most crucial point.
Future and Contingent
The major part of the puzzle that our Protestant friends are missing is that there are many biblical texts revealing justification to have a future and contingent sense as well as those that show a past sense.
In other words, justification and salvation also have a sense in which they are not complete in the lives of believers.
Perhaps this is most plainly seen in Galatians 5:1-5:
quote: For freedom Christ has set us free; stand fast therefore, and do not submit again to a yoke of slavery. Now I, Paul, say to you that if you receive circumcision, Christ will be of no advantage to you.
I testify again to every man who receives circumcision that he is bound to keep the whole law.
You are severed from Christ, you who would be justified by the law; you have fallen away from grace.
For through the Spirit, by faith, we wait for the hope of righteousness.
The Greek word used in verse 5 and here translated as righteousness is dikaiosunes, which can be translated either as "righteousness" or as "justification." In fact, Romans 4:3, which we quoted above, uses a verb form of this same word for justification.
Now the fact that St. Paul tells us we "wait for the hope of [justification]" is very significant.
As we said before, what is hoped for not yet possessed.
It is still in the future.
Romans 8:24 tells us "For in this hope we were saved. Now hope that is seen is not hope. For who hopes for what he sees? But if we hope for what we do not see, we wait for it with patience."
The context of Galatians is clear: Paul warns Galatian Christians that if they attempt to be justified—even though they are already justified in one sense, through baptism, according to Galatians 3:27—by the works of the law, they will fall from the grace of Christ.
Why?
Because they would be attempting to be justified apart from Christ and the gospel of Christ. That they could not do! For "those who are in the flesh cannot please God" (Rom. 8:8, cf. Gal. 5:19-21).
"The flesh" is a reference to the human person apart from grace.
This example of justification being obtained in the future is not an isolated case. Numerous biblical texts indicate both justification and salvation to be future and contingent realities:
Romans 2:13-16: For it is not the hearers of the law who are righteous before God, but the doers of the law who will be justified … on that day when, according to my gospel, God judges the secrets of men by Jesus Christ.
Romans 6:16: Do you not know that if you yield yourselves to anyone as obedient slaves, you are slaves of the one whom you obey, either of sin, which leads to death, or of obedience which leads to righteousness? (Greek dikaiosunen, "justification")
Matthew 10:22: And you will be hated of all men for my name’s sake. But he who endures to the end will be saved.
Romans 13:11: For salvation is nearer to us now than when we first believed.
1 Corinthians 5:5: You are to deliver this man to Satan for the destruction of the flesh that his spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus.
Are Future Sins Forgiven?
The Calvinist interpretation of Romans 5:1 not only takes the verse out of context, but it leads to still other unbiblical teaching.
As we mentioned above, at least from a Calvinist perspective, this understanding of Romans 5:1 leads to the untenable position that all future sins are forgiven at the point of saving faith.
Where is that in the Bible? It’s not.
First John 1:8-9 could not make any clearer the fact that our future sins will only be forgiven when we confess them: "If we say we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just, and will forgive our sins and cleanse us from all unrighteousness."
I should note here that many Calvinists—and many of those who may not be full-fledged Calvinists, but hold to the "once saved always saved" part of classic Calvinist doctrine—respond to this text by claiming that the forgiveness of sins John is talking about has nothing to do with one’s justification before God.
This text only considers whether or not one is in fellowship with God. And this "fellowship with God" is interpreted to mean only whether or not one will receive God’s blessings in this life.
This position presents a problem.
The context of the passage does not allow for this interpretation. In fact, if you look at verses 5-7, John says:
God is light and in him is no darkness at all. If we say we have fellowship with him, while we walk in darkness, we lie and do not live according to the truth; but if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus his Son cleanses us from all sin. (1 John 1:5-7)
This text makes clear that the "fellowship" spoken of is essential for us to 1) walk in the light as God is in the light, and 2) have our sins forgiven.
If we are not in "fellowship," according to verse 6, then we are in darkness. And if we are in darkness, we are not in God, "who is light and in him is no darkness" (5).
Nothing in this text even hints at the possibility that you can be out of "fellowship" with God, but still go to heaven.
That is, of course, unless you have that fellowship restored by the confession of your sins. This is precisely what verses 8 and 9 are all about.
The Example of Abraham
We can agree with our Calvinist friends that Romans 4:3 demonstrates Abraham to have been justified through the gift of faith he received from God.
The Catholic Church acknowledges what the text clearly says: "Abraham believed God and it was reckoned to him as righteousness," referencing Genesis 15:6.
There is more to this text, however, than many of our Protestant friends know.
While the Catholic Church agrees that Abraham was justified by faith in Genesis 15:6 as Paul said, we also note that Abraham was justified at other times in his life as well, indicating justification to have another.aspect to it.
Again, there is a sense in which justification is a past action in the life of believers, but there is another sense in which justification is revealed to be a process as well.
Abraham was depicted as having saving faith in God long before Genesis 15:6.
Abraham had already responded to God’s call in Genesis 12 with what is revealed to be saving faith, years before his encounter with the Lord in Genesis 15.
In addition, Abraham is revealed to have been justified again in Genesis 22, years after Genesis 15, when he offered his son Isaac in sacrifice in obedience to the Lord.
Genesis 12:14: Now the Lord said to Abraham, "Go from your country and your kindred and your father’s house to the land that I will show you…" So Abram went, as the Lord had told him. Compare Hebrews 11:6,8: And without faith it is impossible to please God… By faith Abraham obeyed when he was called… and he went out, not knowing where he was to go.
Genesis 15:4,6 : "This man [a slave] shall not be your heir; your own son shall be your heir." And [Abram] believed the Lord: and he reckoned it to him as righteousness. Compare Romans 4:3: For what does the scripture say? "Abraham believed God, and it was reckoned to him as righteousness."
Genesis 22:15-17: And the angel of the Lord called to Abraham a second time from heaven, and said, "By myself I have sworn, says the Lord, because you have done this, and have not withheld your son, your only son, I will indeed bless you, and I will multiply your descendents as the stars of heaven… because you have obeyed my voice."
Compare James 2:21-22,24: Was not Abraham our father justified by works, when he offered his son Isaac upon the altar?… faith was completed by works… You see that a man is justified by works and not by faith alone.
The Bible tells us Abraham had faith way back in Genesis 12. And according to Hebrews 11:6-8, this was not a natural faith analogous to the faith the demons have (see James 2:19), but rather a supernatural and saving faith given as a gift from God.
If Abraham was not justified until Genesis 15:6, how could he already have saving faith in Genesis 12?
In addition, if Abraham was justified once and for all in Genesis 15:6, why did he need to be justified again in Genesis 22 according to James 2:21?
The reason is simple: According to these texts, justification is revealed in Scripture to be a process rather than a mere one-time event.
Tim Staples is Director of Apologetics and Evangelization here at Catholic Answers, but he was not always Catholic. Tim was raised a Southern Baptist.
Edited by bwellmysoul on 05/14/2012 09:44:00
-
-
Contact:
PM
Member since 11/17/2007
Location: Canada
OK, Evangelist, after reading through your responses there are two areas that all of this boils down to.
You say that you are firm that all future sins are forgiven, and that a person can throw away their righteousness and therefore become unrighteous and go to Hell.
Is this correct?
Pax et Bonum,
Faith_at_Large
"There are some in the Church, who not only do not do what is good, but even persecute it, and hate in others what they neglect to do themselves. The sin of these men is not that of infirmity or ignorance, but deliberate willful sin." — Pope St. Gregory the Great (AD 540-604)
-
-
Contact:
PM
Member since 07/10/2003
Location: Germany
quote: Originally posted by Faith_at_Large
OK, Evangelist, after reading through your responses there are two areas that all of this boils down to.
You say that you are firm that all future sins are forgiven, and that a person can throw away their righteousness and therefore become unrighteous and go to Hell.
Is this correct?
yes, a born again christian can throw away thier born again eternal life and accept etermal damnation which all sinner accept and agree with when they don't have a Saviour! But still the good news is that Jesus even died for them, but the salvation message and death , vurial and resurrection is renounced so they go back to the adam sin which I bold in red which sends them to hell even though that sin was paid for in full! So now what your point FAITH!
one love
I may or may not believe coming forward is a necessary condition for salvation. But, if I clearly taught elsewhere that repentance/belief alone was sufficient no one would think coming forward is necessary for salvation,or water baptism is necessary for salvation.
-
-
Contact:
PM
Member since 07/10/2003
Location: Germany
quote: Originally posted by evangelist
[quote]Originally posted by evangelist
[
So FAITH are you agreeing what I bold in color about those many sciptures about our righteousness and about how we became sinners without doing any sins, and how we became righteous without doing righteous things or commandmend memnts and laws to be Holy Justified, pure, righteous,and sons of God?
Remember the bold red is for sinners and the blue bold is for born again righteous christians!
Ro:5:14: Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over after the similitude of Adam's transgression, who is the figure of him that was to come. Ro:5:15: But not as the offence, so also is the free gift. For if through the offence of one many be dead, much more the grace of God, and the gift by grace, which is by one man, Jesus Christ, hath abounded unto many. Ro:5:16: And not as it was by one that sinned, so is the gift: for the judgment was by one to condemnation, but the free gift is of many offences unto justification.Ro:5:17: For if by one man's offence death reigned by one; much more they which receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness shall reign in life by one, Jesus Christ.)
Notice it all about a gift, not about any obedience or disobedience of any commandment or about any sins we do, plus if any sins was done these scriptures are pointing to Adams and Eve sin, and Jesus righteousness and perfection as a gift towards make kind as believers!
Ro:5:18: Therefore as by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men unto justification of life.
In this verse above is wy all unbelievers will go to hell with thier sins forgivem!
Ro:5:19: For as by one man's disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous.Ro:5:20: Moreover the law entered, that the offence might abound. But where sin abounded, grace did much more abound:
If you can understand what is the understand of MADE in the texts it will blow away your catholic religious spirit!
Ro:5:21: That as sin hath reigned unto death, even so might grace reign through righteousness unto eternal life by Jesus Christ our Lord.
one love
So Faith did you understand what I am asking about Roman 5, because I want to get this straight before I go on to Romans 6 with will be the ice cream on the cake.
one love
I may or may not believe coming forward is a necessary condition for salvation. But, if I clearly taught elsewhere that repentance/belief alone was sufficient no one would think coming forward is necessary for salvation,or water baptism is necessary for salvation.
-
-
Contact:
PM
Member since 11/17/2007
Location: Canada
quote: Originally posted by evangelist
quote: Originally posted by Faith_at_Large
OK, Evangelist, after reading through your responses there are two areas that all of this boils down to.
You say that you are firm that all future sins are forgiven, and that a person can throw away their righteousness and therefore become unrighteous and go to Hell.
Is this correct?
yes, a born again christian can throw away thier born again eternal life and accept etermal damnation which all sinner accept and agree with when they don't have a Saviour! But still the good news is that Jesus even died for them, but the salvation message and death , vurial and resurrection is renounced so they go back to the adam sin which I bold in red which sends them to hell even though that sin was paid for in full! So now what your point FAITH!
one love
Sounds great. Definitely too good to be true.
And all those verses that say that future sins are not automatically forgiven and that sins must be repented of are just bogus lies that I can ignore right?
All I need now is a verse that states specifically that the only sin that can make me unrighteous is the specific sin of rejecting Jesus and I can relax and have some real fun.
We both agree that we can lose our righteousness and that this is NOT a done deal. The fact that rejecting Jesus strips us of our righteousness, as you have frequently admitted, proves that you and I both agree that we can lose our rightousness, so that part is NOT a done deal.
Please provide that verse that explicitly states that rejecting Jesus is the ONLY sin that does this because I already know verses that say it is "a" sin that will do this, but not the ONLY sin that will do this.
Pax et Bonum,
Faith_at_Large
"There are some in the Church, who not only do not do what is good, but even persecute it, and hate in others what they neglect to do themselves. The sin of these men is not that of infirmity or ignorance, but deliberate willful sin." — Pope St. Gregory the Great (AD 540-604)
Edited by Faith_at_Large on 05/14/2012 17:52:46
-
-
Contact:
PM
Member since 07/10/2003
Location: Germany
quote: Originally posted by Faith_at_Large
quote: Originally posted by evangelist
quote: Originally posted by Faith_at_Large
OK, Evangelist, after reading through your responses there are two areas that all of this boils down to.
You say that you are firm that all future sins are forgiven, and that a person can throw away their righteousness and therefore become unrighteous and go to Hell.
Is this correct?
yes, a born again christian can throw away thier born again eternal life and accept etermal damnation which all sinner accept and agree with when they don't have a Saviour! But still the good news is that Jesus even died for them, but the salvation message and death , vurial and resurrection is renounced so they go back to the adam sin which I bold in red which sends them to hell even though that sin was paid for in full! So now what your point FAITH!
one love
Sounds great. Definitely too good to be true.
And all those verses that say that future sins are not automatically forgiven and that sins must be repented of are just bogus lies that I can ignore right?
All I need now is a verse that states specifically that the only sin that can make me unrighteous is the specific sin of rejecting Jesus and I can relax and have some real fun.
We both agree that we can lose our righteousness and that this is NOT a done deal. The fact that rejecting Jesus strips us of our righteousness, as you have frequently admitted, proves that you and I both agree that we can lose our rightousness, so that part is NOT a done deal.
Please provide that verse that explicitly states that rejecting Jesus is the ONLY sin that does this because I already know verses that say it is "a" sin that will do this, but not the ONLY sin that will do this.
So you still didn't answer my question about Roman 5 what I bold in colors!
But the done deal was done on Jesus part for us, so we or anyone else just have to believe that done deal to be righteous or unbelieve to be unrighteous is that more clearer?
Sins was taken care of on the cross, and Jesus took on all other sins beside the only sin of rejecting Jesus or renouncing Him!
Joh:16:8: And when he is come, he will reprove the world of sin, and of righteousness, and of judgment: Joh:16:9: Of sin, because they believe not on me; Joh:16:10: Of righteousness, because I go to my Father, and ye see me no more; Joh:16:11: Of judgment, because the prince of this world is judged.
There´is a important thing to notice the sin is singular not plural sins!
Also read Joh:3:18: He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.
This is also proving a singular sin of unbelief in Jesus is what condemned a person already without any other sins!
M'r:16:16: He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned.
one love
I may or may not believe coming forward is a necessary condition for salvation. But, if I clearly taught elsewhere that repentance/belief alone was sufficient no one would think coming forward is necessary for salvation,or water baptism is necessary for salvation.
Edited by evangelist on 05/15/2012 04:17:56
-
-
Contact:
PM
Member since 01/25/2012
Location: USA
Evangelist,
The context of the words spoken by the Apostles were largely for the conversion of pagans and then of the Jews.
The readings should not be separated from the whole.
The Apostles and the disciples evangelized and then directed people to their Christian communities and to their Churches where their ordained Bishops, priests and deacons taught the catechumens.
Those converts who placed their faith in Jesus, and who believed in the True Presence of Jesus in the Eucharist, came to the Lord's Table through Baptism and through repentance of their mortal sins.
Jesus came to interceed between us and His Father for the forgiveness of our sins. The forgiveness is always there, but we are required to repent of our evil and to ask for Jesus' forgiveness and God's mercy.
We must do this in order to revertly receive Jesus in the Eucharist.
-
-
Contact:
PM
Member since 11/17/2007
Location: Canada
I did. Why do you not read what I wrote.
We both AGREE that if we don't believe in Christ, we are damned. That was never an issue.
Of course those who reject Christ will go to Hell. That is A MORTAL sin.
That verse does NOT say that this is the only sin that sends us to Hell. I have read it over and over and over again.
It says that those that don't believe are condemned. AMEN. Good Catholic teaching there.
ROCK SOLID CATHOLIC TEACHING. Those that have knowledge of Christ and still will not believe in Him are damned.
I would be a heretic if I believed otherwise.
But what does that have to do with our discussion?
I asked you for a verse that PROVES that this is the ONLY sin. Those verses do not prove that.
The verses you gave are some of the ones I mentioned that I already accepted as proving that rejecting Christ will send someone to Hell.
There are other verses that show that other sins will also send people to Hell. I need evidence from you from the Bible that corrects those verses that can only be wrong by your interpretation, and shows that those other sins do not send anyone into the Lake of Fire, and that only rejecting Jesus does.
Pax et Bonum,
Faith_at_Large
"There are some in the Church, who not only do not do what is good, but even persecute it, and hate in others what they neglect to do themselves. The sin of these men is not that of infirmity or ignorance, but deliberate willful sin." — Pope St. Gregory the Great (AD 540-604)
-
-
Contact:
PM
Member since 11/17/2007
Location: Canada
The funny thing is that even you posted once about how to understand scripture correctly and your own post said that if one part of scripture seemed in contradiction with other parts relating to the same subject, then it was necessary to rethink the original interpretation.
I have shown you time and again that past sins are forgiven and new sins must be repented of. But you refuse to answer the specific verses that I give you.
I even asked you to explain "PAST" in that verse that specifically states that Jesus is the propitiation for sins that are PAST, and you wouldn't.
You just played the Bible like a deck of cards and trumped my verse with another verse that you interpret to mean "done deal" when the only thing that was done was that Christ died for our sins, not that we are forgiven of future sins without repenting.
You admit that rejecting Christ strips us of our unrighteousness - Praise the Lord that you accept that much. But you refuse to accept all the other verses that show that this is only one of many sins that can send us to Hell.
None of your magic verses say what you want them to say. I agree 100% with what they actually say, but you are reading more into them than is there.
You cannot go making dogmas out of single words or phrases, and it is a terrible mistake when you accept half a sentence.
Even in one of the passages you gave, it says flat out that we must believe AND be baptized to be saved, but you consistently ignore "and be baptized" and skip to the he who believeth not....
How can you accept only half a sentence and reject the other half?
Pax et Bonum,
Faith_at_Large
"There are some in the Church, who not only do not do what is good, but even persecute it, and hate in others what they neglect to do themselves. The sin of these men is not that of infirmity or ignorance, but deliberate willful sin." — Pope St. Gregory the Great (AD 540-604)
-
-
Contact:
PM
Member since 07/10/2003
Location: Germany
quote: Originally posted by bwellmysoul
Evangelist,
The context of the words spoken by the Apostles were largely for the conversion of pagans and then of the Jews.
The readings should not be separated from the whole.
The Apostles and the disciples evangelized and then directed people to their Christian communities and to their Churches where their ordained Bishops, priests and deacons taught the catechumens.
Those converts who placed their faith in Jesus, and who believed in the True Presence of Jesus in the Eucharist, came to the Lord's Table through Baptism and through repentance of their mortal sins.
Jesus came to interceed between us and His Father for the forgiveness of our sins. The forgiveness is always there, but we are required to repent of our evil and to ask for Jesus' forgiveness and God's mercy.
We must do this in order to revertly receive Jesus in the Eucharist.
YES! and this is why everyone one must do this when they first get born again is recieve the forgiveness of all your sins which is called repentance, and then you recieve the best gift of all is eternal redemption instantly and stays with you untill forever unlesss you renounce Jesus or never truly got born again!
one love
I may or may not believe coming forward is a necessary condition for salvation. But, if I clearly taught elsewhere that repentance/belief alone was sufficient no one would think coming forward is necessary for salvation,or water baptism is necessary for salvation.
-
-
Contact:
PM
Member since 07/10/2003
Location: Germany
quote: Originally posted by Faith_at_Large
I did. Why do you not read what I wrote.
We both AGREE that if we don't believe in Christ, we are damned. That was never an issue.
Of course those who reject Christ will go to Hell. That is A MORTAL sin.
That verse does NOT say that this is the only sin that sends us to Hell. I have read it over and over and over again.
It says that those that don't believe are condemned. AMEN. Good Catholic teaching there.
ROCK SOLID CATHOLIC TEACHING. Those that have knowledge of Christ and still will not believe in Him are damned.
I would be a heretic if I believed otherwise.
But what does that have to do with our discussion?
I asked you for a verse that PROVES that this is the ONLY sin. Those verses do not prove that.
The verses you gave are some of the ones I mentioned that I already accepted as proving that rejecting Christ will send someone to Hell.
There are other verses that show that other sins will also send people to Hell. I need evidence from you from the Bible that corrects those verses that can only be wrong by your interpretation, and shows that those other sins do not send anyone into the Lake of Fire, and that only rejecting Jesus does.
You are not looking at the concept of the gospel and perfection that must be before God to show that it is a singular sin only which sends a person to hell! Do you keep the commandmant FAITH or obedience in all points to be perfect from any other sins?
Jas:2:9: But if ye have respect to persons, ye commit sin, and are convinced of the law as transgressors. Jas:2:10: For whosoever shall keep the whole law, and yet offend in one point, he is guilty of all. Jas:2:11: For he that said, Do not commit adultery, said also, Do not kill. Now if thou commit no adultery, yet if thou kill, thou art become a transgressor of the law. Jas:2:12: So speak ye, and so do, as they that shall be judged by the law of liberty.
So do you keep all the commandment and every single laws to be perfect FAITH??
remember the one point I bold in red is little sins with mortal sins is a point so driving 56 in a 55MPH zone is a sin and you are judge before God as a same as a child abuser or muderer, adulterious person!
one love
I may or may not believe coming forward is a necessary condition for salvation. But, if I clearly taught elsewhere that repentance/belief alone was sufficient no one would think coming forward is necessary for salvation,or water baptism is necessary for salvation.
-
-
Contact:
PM
Member since 11/17/2007
Location: Canada
All sin is wrong, and if any of us commit any sin, we are guilty of sin. AMEN, that be ROCK SOLID CATHOLIC TEACHING.
And I would be a heretic if I did not believe what James said.
BUT, James did not say that all sin merited the same penalty. If he had, then he would have been a liar and his book would not be in the New Testament.
Because, John said explicitly that while all sin is sin, in TOTAL AGREEMENT with James, NOT ALL SIN KILLS.
So driving one mile over the speed limit will not send anyone to Hell, but watching pornography will.
Pax et Bonum,
Faith_at_Large
"There are some in the Church, who not only do not do what is good, but even persecute it, and hate in others what they neglect to do themselves. The sin of these men is not that of infirmity or ignorance, but deliberate willful sin." — Pope St. Gregory the Great (AD 540-604)
-
-
Contact:
PM
Member since 11/17/2007
Location: Canada
Stop treating the Bible like a deck of cards where you can use one verse to knock out other verses.
I gave you the verse that STATES VERY CLEARLY AND WITHOUT ANY AMBIGUITY that future sins are not automatically forgiven. I followed up that verse with numerous verse that show very clearly that sins were not forgiven until they were properly repented of.
You must reconcile all of these verses, not just ignore what you don't like.
Pax et Bonum,
Faith_at_Large
"There are some in the Church, who not only do not do what is good, but even persecute it, and hate in others what they neglect to do themselves. The sin of these men is not that of infirmity or ignorance, but deliberate willful sin." — Pope St. Gregory the Great (AD 540-604)
-
-
Contact:
PM
Member since 01/25/2012
Location: USA
quote: Originally posted by evangelist
quote: Originally posted by bwellmysoul
Evangelist,
The context of the words spoken by the Apostles were largely for the conversion of pagans and then of the Jews.
The readings should not be separated from the whole.
The Apostles and the disciples evangelized and then directed people to their Christian communities and to their Churches where their ordained Bishops, priests and deacons taught the catechumens.
Those converts who placed their faith in Jesus, and who believed in the True Presence of Jesus in the Eucharist, came to the Lord's Table through Baptism and through repentance of their mortal sins.
Jesus came to interceed between us and His Father for the forgiveness of our sins. The forgiveness is always there, but we are required to repent of our evil and to ask for Jesus' forgiveness and God's mercy.
We must do this in order to revertly receive Jesus in the Eucharist.
YES! and this is why everyone one must do this when they first get born again is recieve the forgiveness of all your sins which is called repentance, and then you recieve the best gift of all is eternal redemption instantly and stays with you untill forever unlesss you renounce Jesus or never truly got born again!
one love
You have to selectively pick and choose Sacred Scripture (and throw out multiple numbers of other sections of Scripture) to get that understanding.
Our soul's salvation is not a one time given event. And to "renounce Jesus" is not the only sin which will remove a soul's salvation.
Christians were told by Christ to "be holy". Jesus told His followers (and us) that entertaining lust in the mind is a sin. He said that sin in so corrupting that if we knew the eternal consequences of sin we would be willing to remove our hand or our eyes.
quote: “If your hand or foot causes you to sin, cut if off and cast it from you."
Why would Jesus say that if as "born again" Christians our souls are eternally saved?
Why would these Scripture passages be in the Bible:
quote: He that endures to the end shall be saved (Matt. 10:22)?
quote: Matthew 7, reports how some people who think they are saved, because they performed miracles and prophesied in his name, yet Jesus tells them: "I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!"
Martin Luther was the first to begin the false idea that man's salvation was secure unless and only unless he renounced Christ. Luther suffered from an obsessive compulsive disorder called scrupulousity. Some say it is caused by human pride, and is an inability to accept God's mercy, forgiveness and grace.
So, Luther developed his own canon and his own interpretation of Sacred Scripture - in disregard of what the Apostles had instructed to their ordained Bishops.

|
|