Spero Forum - Baptist, Protestant, and Catholic Discussion
Username: Password: Save Password Forgot your Password?
Spero Forum - Baptist, Protestant, and Catholic Discussion

past present and futures sins forgiven VS Penance

Posted on 11/07/2009 at 06:16:57  |  Reply  |  Report Abuse |  0
past present and futures sins forgiven VS Penance!

What is the meaning or the effect of penance when our sins are already forgiven??

I mean after we get saved or born again we do sin some how little or mortal sins, and the blood of Jesus should cover all these sins only once and for all times.

Heb:10:10: By the which will we are sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all.

In contexts this is not once and for all people but for all times!
We can see this truth as we see the contexts of the whole rest of this chapter.

Heb:10:11: And every priest standeth daily ministering and offering oftentimes the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins:
Heb:10:12: But this man, after he had offered one sacrifice for sins for ever, sat down on the right hand of God;

Now this verse is showing it is pointing to all time forever!

Heb:10:13: From henceforth expecting till his enemies be made his footstool.
Heb:10:14: For by one offering he hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified.

Again it is proven the past , present and future time is forever forgiven for whgat Christ has done and on top of that made us justified and sanctified!

Heb:10:15: Whereof the Holy Ghost also is a witness to us: for after that he had said before,
Heb:10:16: This is the covenant that I will make with them after those days, saith the Lord, I will put my laws into their hearts, and in their minds will I write them;
Heb:10:17: And their sins and iniquities will I remember no more.

Those after sins does God remember them no more, but we might have issue and problem getting the deleted from our sin consceince and minds as human but not God!

Heb:10:18: Now where remission of these is, there is no more offering for sin.

Heb:10:19: Having therefore, brethren, boldness to enter into the holiest by the blood of Jesus,

Sp knmowing this we can walk boldly into heaven without any purgatory , penance, or sacrifices and rituals of men!

Now what is the diference of penenance with what the bible says and teaches??

one love

I may or may not believe coming forward is a necessary condition for salvation. But, if I clearly taught elsewhere that repentance/belief alone was sufficient no one would think coming forward is necessary for salvation,or water baptism is necessary for salvation.
from the community...
Page: of 3
Next Page
What I'm reading/watching/listening to now.
Posted on 11/07/2009 at 06:46:47  |  Reply  |  Report Abuse |  1
quote:
What is the meaning or the effect of penance when our sins are already forgiven??


because sin affects more than just us. to use an extreme point... if i sin by stealing from someone... and later repent, i will be forgiven. but because i am forgiven it goes without say that i should pay back what i stole. that is penance.. it is a completion of repentance. if a person repents only part of the way then how can they really be forgiven? if i steal and just say "well god will forgive me" that would make the gospel a means to sin, wouldn't it? penance isn't so much about forgiveness as it is about christ working in us to make us perfect. in a way our whole christian life is one of penance... sure we are forgiven but we are also still learning to trust, we are still needing to be purged of things that betray our trust or faith. if we are really interested in forgiveness then we need to complete a penance and know that christ is going to finish what he started.

there is no real difference between the idea of penance and what the bible teaches but more between your ideas and what the bible teaches evan. penance doesn't mean christ didn't die once for all... as a matter of fact it's because of christs salvation that we can have true repentance and penance is a part of repenting. i think you see a problem because you really don't understand either the bible or theology, but i do think that you would agree that if you stole money from someone and then repented but never gave it back then you have not trusted christ at all and therefore never really repented and as such that sin still stands between you and christ.
The truth does not change according to our ability to stomach it.
Flannery O'Connor
Go to Top of Page
Posted on 11/07/2009 at 07:42:38  |  Reply  |  Report Abuse |  0
quote:
Originally posted by mikejuli

quote:
What is the meaning or the effect of penance when our sins are already forgiven??


because sin affects more than just us. to use an extreme point... if i sin by stealing from someone... and later repent, i will be forgiven. but because i am forgiven it goes without say that i should pay back what i stole. that is penance.. it is a completion of repentance. if a person repents only part of the way then how can they really be forgiven? if i steal and just say "well god will forgive me" that would make the gospel a means to sin, wouldn't it? penance isn't so much about forgiveness as it is about christ working in us to make us perfect. in a way our whole christian life is one of penance... sure we are forgiven but we are also still learning to trust, we are still needing to be purged of things that betray our trust or faith. if we are really interested in forgiveness then we need to complete a penance and know that christ is going to finish what he started.

there is no real difference between the idea of penance and what the bible teaches but more between your ideas and what the bible teaches evan. penance doesn't mean christ didn't die once for all... as a matter of fact it's because of christs salvation that we can have true repentance and penance is a part of repenting. i think you see a problem because you really don't understand either the bible or theology, but i do think that you would agree that if you stole money from someone and then repented but never gave it back then you have not trusted christ at all and therefore never really repented and as such that sin still stands between you and christ.



Thank you very much for your reply Mike!
You did explain it to me in a way I didn't see , or know penance is work in that way of returning something back.
Maybe it is my misuderstanding , but can you make it clear how Jesus finished work is uncompleted as you quoted, in which Jesus just only started??
Also iF I stole something or didn't do what I should I think God would see my heart and it is forgiven unto me or my sin is not imputted to me because of my willingness or motive is to pay back what I stole , but maybe don't have it now to pay back or give back.
The person might be mad but God instantly forgave and forgotten because He seen my heart, but people are judging on the outward performance and declare it justified when they see the evidence appear, or the fruits of forgiven by giving back what is stollen or broken.
This is why I mention about eternal redemption of our past , present and future sins forgiven by God by our hearts.
But a greater too good news is that our born again spirits can't sin or steal, lie, or do evil, neither can anyting from the gates of hell prevail against our born again saved Holy spirits , even our performances or actions or others!

one love
I may or may not believe coming forward is a necessary condition for salvation. But, if I clearly taught elsewhere that repentance/belief alone was sufficient no one would think coming forward is necessary for salvation,or water baptism is necessary for salvation.
Go to Top of Page
Posted on 11/07/2009 at 07:45:43  |  Reply  |  Report Abuse |  0
God says He will never forsake us or leave us so our actions don't chase God away or seperate us from Him.

Heb:13:5: Let your conversation be without covetousness; and be content with such things as ye have: for he hath said, I will never leave thee, nor forsake thee.
Heb:13:6: So that we may boldly say, The Lord is my helper, and I will not fear what man shall do unto m

So again what if we don't do a penance would thet do the opersite and cancel out the mercy love and grace of God toward us ???



one love
I may or may not believe coming forward is a necessary condition for salvation. But, if I clearly taught elsewhere that repentance/belief alone was sufficient no one would think coming forward is necessary for salvation,or water baptism is necessary for salvation.
Edited by evangelist on 11/07/2009 07:51:35
Go to Top of Page
    • 51reputation
    • 1377 Posts
    Fifth Member  
    Contact:  PM
    Member since 01/17/2007
    Location: USA
    View jdubya's full profile or recent posts
Posted on 11/07/2009 at 09:26:19  |  Reply  |  Report Abuse |  0
The way you read Hebrews is like taking a commercial break from the regularly scheduled program, as if the commercials had anything to do with the program content.

The book of Hebrews speaks nothing of a one time imputation of Christ's righteousness to one's account. The major theme of the book is Christ's ongoing ministry as our high priest and mediator of the New Covenant. This is the basis of our sanctification which is necessary for salvation.
If the snippet of Hebrews 10 that you present shows that are sins are forgiven past, present and future, it makes not only the rest of Hebrews 10, but nearly the entire book full of contradictions and meaningless words.

What does the rest of Hebrews 10 say?


Hbr 10:21 and since we have a great priest over the house of God,
22 let us draw near with a true heart in full assurance of faith, with our hearts sprinkled clean from an evil conscience and our bodies washed with pure water.
23 Let us hold fast the confession of our hope without wavering, for he who promised is faithful;
24 and let us consider how to stir up one another to love and good works,
25 not neglecting to meet together, as is the habit of some, but encouraging one another, and all the more as you see the Day drawing near.
26 For if we sin deliberately after receiving the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins,
27 but a fearful prospect of judgment, and a fury of fire which will consume the adversaries.
28 A man who has violated the law of Moses dies without mercy at the testimony of two or three witnesses.
29 How much worse punishment do you think will be deserved by the man who has spurned the Son of God, and profaned the blood of the covenant by which he was sanctified, and outraged the Spirit of grace?
30 For we know him who said, "Vengeance is mine, I will repay." And again, "The Lord will judge his people."
31 It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.
32 But recall the former days when, after you were enlightened, you endured a hard struggle with sufferings,
33 sometimes being publicly exposed to abuse and affliction, and sometimes being partners with those so treated.
34 For you had compassion on the prisoners, and you joyfully accepted the plundering of your property, since you knew that you yourselves had a better possession and an abiding one.
35 Therefore do not throw away your confidence, which has a great reward.
36 For you have need of endurance, so that you may do the will of God and receive what is promised.
37 "For yet a little while, and the coming one shall come and shall not tarry;
38 but my righteous one shall live by faith, and if he shrinks back, my soul has no pleasure in him."
39 But we are not of those who shrink back and are destroyed, but of those who have faith and keep their souls.


Willful sin will destroy you (send you to hell) and the sacrifice of Christ is no longer effective. You will be worse off than someone who broke the Law of Moses.
He is speaking to those who were sanctified by the blood of Christ already and (according to you) have already had past, present and future sins forgiven, yet they are headed for destruction. This makes your interpretation without any merit whatsoever, and this is from the same Chapter so we have the proper context.

Indeed, these verses and dozens of others in Hebrews make your interpretation impossible.

The sacrifice of Christ was once for eternity, because it is effective for the forgiveness of sins and infinitely superior to the continual sacrifice of bulls and goats.

Christ made the payment for sins. The application of his action on the cross is how we are sanctified and how are sins are forgiven.

He has deposited an infinite sum of grace and mercy to an account with your name on it and it is free for the taking. If you don't make the withdrawals, it is useless.
Go to Top of Page
What I'm reading/watching/listening to now.
Posted on 11/07/2009 at 10:27:55  |  Reply  |  Report Abuse |  0
Matthew 5:18
For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
"There are water and tears; the water of baptism and the tears of repentance." -St. Ambrose“
Go to Top of Page
Posted on 11/07/2009 at 11:41:45  |  Reply  |  Report Abuse |  0
quote:
Originally posted by jdubya

The way you read Hebrews is like taking a commercial break from the regularly scheduled program, as if the commercials had anything to do with the program content.

Quote EV:
That is the way you see it in the carnal understanding.
If you did a one or two year study and research alone on Hebrews and Romans you will see very clearly I am right, and your spirit will also bear reccord of the truth
.

The book of Hebrews speaks nothing of a one time imputation of Christ's righteousness to one's account. The major theme of the book is Christ's ongoing ministry as our high priest and mediator of the New Covenant. This is the basis of our sanctification which is necessary for salvation.
If the snippet of Hebrews 10 that you present shows that are sins are forgiven past, present and future, it makes not only the rest of Hebrews 10, but nearly the entire book full of contradictions and meaningless words.

Quote EVangelist:
The context shows what the author has in mind: the removal of sin (v. 4) and a cleansed conscience (v. 2), so that we can approach God to worship him (v. 1b). The author seems to view all of these as the same basic concept. The old covenant could picture forgiveness, but could not achieve it.

In Christ, we are assured that we have been completely redeemed. His will and his body were given for us, and it was fully effective, once for all time.

Perfect forever

Our acceptance by God does not depend on the performance of rituals (either ancient or modern)—it depends on what Christ has already done, and it is therefore guaranteed.


my source:
http://www.wcg.org/lit/bible/epis/heb10.htm

“Willful sinning” in this passage carries the idea of consciously and deliberately rejecting Christ. To know God’s way, to hear it preached, to study it, to count oneself among the faithful, and then to turn away is to become apostate. Sinning willfully carries with it the idea of sinning continually and deliberately. Such a person does not sin because of ignorance, nor is he carried away by momentary temptations he is too weak to resist. The willful sinner sins because of an established way of thinking and acting which he has no desire to give up. The true believer, on the other hand, is one who lapses into sin and loses temporary fellowship with God. But he will eventually come back to God in repentance because his heavenly Father will continually woo and convict him until he can’t stay away any longer. The true apostate will continue to sin, deliberately, willingly and with abandon. John tells us that “No one who is born of God practices sin, because His seed abides in him and he cannot sin, because he is born of God” (1 John 3:9).

Apostates have knowledge, but no application of that knowledge. They can be found in the presence of the light of Christ, mostly in the church, among God’s people. Judas Iscariot is the perfect example—he had knowledge but he lacked true faith.

my source above come from:
http://www.gotquestions.org/Hebrews-10-26.html

I could give many more sources but I'll start with these because they also did their bible study on Hebrews rightly dividing the Word of God.




What does the rest of Hebrews 10 say?


Hbr 10:21 and since we have a great priest over the house of God,
22 let us draw near with a true heart in full assurance of faith, with our hearts sprinkled clean from an evil conscience and our bodies washed with pure water.
23 Let us hold fast the confession of our hope without wavering, for he who promised is faithful;
24 and let us consider how to stir up one another to love and good works,
25 not neglecting to meet together, as is the habit of some, but encouraging one another, and all the more as you see the Day drawing near.
26 For if we sin deliberately after receiving the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins,
27 but a fearful prospect of judgment, and a fury of fire which will consume the adversaries.
28 A man who has violated the law of Moses dies without mercy at the testimony of two or three witnesses.
29 How much worse punishment do you think will be deserved by the man who has spurned the Son of God, and profaned the blood of the covenant by which he was sanctified, and outraged the Spirit of grace?
30 For we know him who said, "Vengeance is mine, I will repay." And again, "The Lord will judge his people."
31 It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.
32 But recall the former days when, after you were enlightened, you endured a hard struggle with sufferings,
33 sometimes being publicly exposed to abuse and affliction, and sometimes being partners with those so treated.
34 For you had compassion on the prisoners, and you joyfully accepted the plundering of your property, since you knew that you yourselves had a better possession and an abiding one.
35 Therefore do not throw away your confidence, which has a great reward.
36 For you have need of endurance, so that you may do the will of God and receive what is promised.
37 "For yet a little while, and the coming one shall come and shall not tarry;
38 but my righteous one shall live by faith, and if he shrinks back, my soul has no pleasure in him."
39 But we are not of those who shrink back and are destroyed, but of those who have faith and keep their souls.


Willful sin will destroy you (send you to hell) and the sacrifice of Christ is no longer effective. You will be worse off than someone who broke the Law of Moses.
He is speaking to those who were sanctified by the blood of Christ already and (according to you) have already had past, present and future sins forgiven, yet they are headed for destruction. This makes your interpretation without any merit whatsoever, and this is from the same Chapter so we have the proper context.

Indeed, these verses and dozens of others in Hebrews make your interpretation impossible.

The sacrifice of Christ was once for eternity, because it is effective for the forgiveness of sins and infinitely superior to the continual sacrifice of bulls and goats.

Christ made the payment for sins. The application of his action on the cross is how we are sanctified and how are sins are forgiven.

He has deposited an infinite sum of grace and mercy to an account with your name on it and it is free for the taking. If you don't make the withdrawals, it is useless.




It is not about a withdrawal but an accepting or rejecting in what Christ already has done past tence, that is the to good news of the gospel, and sin is not any issue to believer.

This is why I mention a purgatory can'tz work unless you cut hebrews out your bibles!

This is also why penance is another issue and problem to what the bible teaches.

one love
I may or may not believe coming forward is a necessary condition for salvation. But, if I clearly taught elsewhere that repentance/belief alone was sufficient no one would think coming forward is necessary for salvation,or water baptism is necessary for salvation.
Go to Top of Page
Posted on 11/07/2009 at 11:50:52  |  Reply  |  Report Abuse |  0
quote:
Originally posted by acumenCry

Matthew 5:18
For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.



You do know that the law was not to help us but to show us we need God mercy and grace only.
The law make us sin more and makes us disobey more!

Ro:7:6: But now we are delivered from the law, that being dead wherein we were held; that we should serve in newness of spirit, and not in the oldness of the letter.
Ro:7:7: What shall we say then? Is the law sin? God forbid. Nay, I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said, Thou shalt not covet.

1Co:15:56: The sting of death is sin; and the strength of sin is the law.

one love
I may or may not believe coming forward is a necessary condition for salvation. But, if I clearly taught elsewhere that repentance/belief alone was sufficient no one would think coming forward is necessary for salvation,or water baptism is necessary for salvation.
Go to Top of Page
    • 51reputation
    • 1377 Posts
    Fifth Member  
    Contact:  PM
    Member since 01/17/2007
    Location: USA
    View jdubya's full profile or recent posts
Posted on 11/07/2009 at 12:32:39  |  Reply  |  Report Abuse |  0
Don't give me this carnal understanding stuff. That is simply an excuse to interpret and manipulate the bible how ever you want and try to deceive people with your superior 'spiritual' understanding.

I don't care how long one studies Hebrews. If they seek to justify their belief system and replace the clear text with a gnostic spiritual understanding, you could study it forever and still never understand what it says.

God didn't write Hebrews in code. This is exactly what the gnostic heretics tried to peddle with their special knowledge.

So how do you explain Hebrews to someone who doesn't quite get the 'spiritual' code?
Go to Top of Page
Posted on 11/07/2009 at 13:25:58  |  Reply  |  Report Abuse |  0
quote:
Originally posted by jdubya

Don't give me this carnal understanding stuff. That is simply an excuse to interpret and manipulate the bible how ever you want and try to deceive people with your superior 'spiritual' understanding.

I don't care how long one studies Hebrews. If they seek to justify their belief system and replace the clear text with a gnostic spiritual understanding, you could study it forever and still never understand what it says.

God didn't write Hebrews in code. This is exactly what the gnostic heretics tried to peddle with their special knowledge.

So how do you explain Hebrews to someone who doesn't quite get the 'spiritual' code?




First I tell them to get saved and born and continue from there!
They will get the same revelation as they study the book!

one love
I may or may not believe coming forward is a necessary condition for salvation. But, if I clearly taught elsewhere that repentance/belief alone was sufficient no one would think coming forward is necessary for salvation,or water baptism is necessary for salvation.
Go to Top of Page
    • 51reputation
    • 1377 Posts
    Fifth Member  
    Contact:  PM
    Member since 01/17/2007
    Location: USA
    View jdubya's full profile or recent posts
Posted on 11/07/2009 at 15:02:39  |  Reply  |  Report Abuse |  0
Here are two verses that appear to be in conflict. Please show me how you resolve them.

Heb:10:14: For by one offering he hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified.

sanctified here is a present tense participle, not a past tense verb or aorist. The literal translation should be "the ones being sanctified" or "those/them that are being sanctified". Indeed, many bibles use something similar. This is describing a process.

29 How much worse punishment do you think will be deserved by the man who has spurned the Son of God, and profaned the blood of the covenant by which he was sanctified, and outraged the Spirit of grace?

Now sanctified here is an aorist tense verb, indicating a past tense event which means the person in question has already been born again. That is what the author is telling us. According to you, a born again Christian has his sins forgiven past, present and future. Well, not this person. Sounds like a momentary redemption, because this person was born again, and by continual and willful sin, he has fallen from grace and has been condemned to hell. The willful sins are not being forgiven which seems to explode your thesis.

Now its your turn to show me the difference in these two verses.
Go to Top of Page
Posted on 11/07/2009 at 18:30:34  |  Reply  |  Report Abuse |  0
quote:
Originally posted by jdubya

Here are two verses that appear to be in conflict. Please show me how you resolve them.

Heb:10:14: For by one offering he hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified.

sanctified here is a present tense participle, not a past tense verb or aorist. The literal translation should be "the ones being sanctified" or "those/them that are being sanctified". Indeed, many bibles use something similar. This is describing a process.

29 How much worse punishment do you think will be deserved by the man who has spurned the Son of God, and profaned the blood of the covenant by which he was sanctified, and outraged the Spirit of grace?

Now sanctified here is an aorist tense verb, indicating a past tense event which means the person in question has already been born again. That is what the author is telling us. According to you, a born again Christian has his sins forgiven past, present and future. Well, not this person. Sounds like a momentary redemption, because this person was born again, and by continual and willful sin, he has fallen from grace and has been condemned to hell. The willful sins are not being forgiven which seems to explode your thesis.

Now its your turn to show me the difference in these two verses.



First of all the text is a past tence showing it is a done deal and the person is sanctified not a process, so the eternal redemption is true in that verse.

the second verse is more a question , but in itself also a staement of truth, like the same in Hebrews 1 showing that God would never make any angel a Son

one love
I may or may not believe coming forward is a necessary condition for salvation. But, if I clearly taught elsewhere that repentance/belief alone was sufficient no one would think coming forward is necessary for salvation,or water baptism is necessary for salvation.
Go to Top of Page
What I'm reading/watching/listening to now.
Posted on 11/07/2009 at 18:44:28  |  Reply  |  Report Abuse |  0
quote:


Thank you very much for your reply Mike!
You did explain it to me in a way I didn't see , or know penance is work in that way of returning something back.


it's not so much the giving back as it is really understanding repentance. you either really repent or you don't. i would say that a person not willing to do penance probably hasn't really repented in their heart but only their words.

quote:
Maybe it is my misuderstanding , but can you make it clear how Jesus finished work is uncompleted as you quoted, in which Jesus just only started??


must be your misunderstanding as i cannot see where i said jesus work was uncompleted. unless you mean my reference to phillipians 1:6 Being confident of this, that he who began a good work in you will carry it on to completion until the day of Christ Jesus. anyway paul was confident that what christ started he would finish.... but i do understand how you could think that meant christs work wasn't finished.

quote:

Also iF I stole something or didn't do what I should I think God would see my heart and it is forgiven unto me or my sin is not imputted to me because of my willingness or motive is to pay back what I stole , but maybe don't have it now to pay back or give back.


that's understandable.. but only reinforces the idea of penance... after all if i committed murder... i just don't have the ability to bring that life back... or if i falsely accused people of some horrible crime... i could barely give them back their reputation... but if my heart was indifferent to trying to right a wrong, i would say that my repentance was fake... and worse if i thought it was all o.k. because jesus saved me... so screw them.... well it seems obvious to me that that person has confused jesus with satan.

quote:

The person might be mad but God instantly forgave and forgotten because He seen my heart, but people are judging on the outward performance and declare it justified when they see the evidence appear, or the fruits of forgiven by giving back what is stollen or broken.


non of that really has anything to do with penance. i could perform penance by returning money to a person i stole from and they may still be angry with me... the real point is that we make sure our hearts are really right before god... that our repentance is real... fruit in keeping with repentance, and not just using grace and jesus blood as an excuse for sin and crime.

quote:

This is why I mention about eternal redemption of our past , present and future sins forgiven by God by our hearts.


but that's just an invention of evangelicals. ananias and saphira, or even the brother cast out of the corinthian fellowhip are all examples of sin still being real and needing to be repented of. especially for the believer. salvation is not a get away with sin card.

quote:

But a greater too good news is that our born again spirits can't sin or steal, lie, or do evil, neither can anyting from the gates of hell prevail against our born again saved Holy spirits , even our performances or actions or others!

one love




even if there was a born again spirit as your theology promotes it still is not a justification for your body and soul to sin. that is the equivalent of blaming it on voices in your head. not to mention in the cases i mentioned above there is no excuse given, no claim about a born again spirit that nullifies their sinful behaviour. i would have to wonder why ananias and saphira died or why that poor guy was handed over to "satan" by paul.... when it didn't matter because they had a born again spirit....

mike
The truth does not change according to our ability to stomach it.
Flannery O'Connor
Go to Top of Page
    • 51reputation
    • 1377 Posts
    Fifth Member  
    Contact:  PM
    Member since 01/17/2007
    Location: USA
    View jdubya's full profile or recent posts
Posted on 11/07/2009 at 22:44:59  |  Reply  |  Report Abuse |  0
quote:
Originally posted by evangelist

quote:
Originally posted by jdubya

Here are two verses that appear to be in conflict. Please show me how you resolve them.

Heb:10:14: For by one offering he hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified.

sanctified here is a present tense participle, not a past tense verb or aorist. The literal translation should be "the ones being sanctified" or "those/them that are being sanctified". Indeed, many bibles use something similar. This is describing a process.

29 How much worse punishment do you think will be deserved by the man who has spurned the Son of God, and profaned the blood of the covenant by which he was sanctified, and outraged the Spirit of grace?

Now sanctified here is an aorist tense verb, indicating a past tense event which means the person in question has already been born again. That is what the author is telling us. According to you, a born again Christian has his sins forgiven past, present and future. Well, not this person. Sounds like a momentary redemption, because this person was born again, and by continual and willful sin, he has fallen from grace and has been condemned to hell. The willful sins are not being forgiven which seems to explode your thesis.

Now its your turn to show me the difference in these two verses.



First of all the text is a past tence showing it is a done deal and the person is sanctified not a process, so the eternal redemption is true in that verse.

the second verse is more a question , but in itself also a staement of truth, like the same in Hebrews 1 showing that God would never make any angel a Son

one love



I gave you the correct tenses from the Greek Evan. Check them for yourself. Present tense is ongoing, participle means the verb is used like a noun but retains the tense. The meaning is thus the "ones being sanctified". Thus it is a process and it makes perfect sense, because this is how Jesus is fulfilling his high priestly ministry from heaven.

This is the entry from my interlinear for verse 14:
hagiazomenous G37 vp Pres Pas Acc Pl m

In addition, the passive voice means that someone besides the subject is doing the sanctifying. In this case it is Jesus who is continually sanctifying the ones that are being sanctified.


In verse 29 it is an aorist tense which is an event (punctiliar action) and almost always past tense in the bible. Since we have no equivalent in English to the aorist, the context determines the time aspect. In this case it is clearly past tense. In other words, one who has already been born again. That is clear. Again, look it up for yourself.
Go to Top of Page
Posted on 11/10/2009 at 10:54:37  |  Reply  |  Report Abuse |  0
thank you for that information jdubya!

one love
I may or may not believe coming forward is a necessary condition for salvation. But, if I clearly taught elsewhere that repentance/belief alone was sufficient no one would think coming forward is necessary for salvation,or water baptism is necessary for salvation.
Go to Top of Page
Posted on 11/14/2009 at 11:46:22  |  Reply  |  Report Abuse |  0
i understand the doctrine evangelist, we as christians dont ask for forgiveness or do penance to stay saved, we do it to be refreshed and humbled and to avoid a good trip to the woodshed with our Lord...if we believe our constant repentance holds our salvation, then we really dont believe we are actually saved and we claim a part in our salvation, and in my opinion, enter into unbelief about what was really accomplished onthe cross..all the glory to Christ!
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 3
Next Page

Newest Topics

by evangelist...

 

Recent Topics

14 replies
 

Newest Updates

14 replies
Jump To:
Spero Forum - Baptist, Protestant, and Catholic Discussion © 2002-2009 Spero Subscribe by Email RSS Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000