Obama to fund forced abortions

De-funded during the Bush Administration, US money for the UN Population Fund that supports China's policy of coercive abortion will flow again during the Obama Administrations, say supporters.

Article Tools


Supporters of the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) are confident that President-elect Barack Obama will reverse the Bush administration’s 2002 decision to stop the $40 million it received in U.S. funding. The policy was instated because of UNFPA’s support for China’s one-child policy, which includes coercive abortion practices.

Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D – N.Y.) said the funding will be approved by the Democratic majority Congress. Her comments came while speaking Wednesday at a press conference at the National Press Club where the 2008 U.N. report on world population was released.

“You know the president will have to do nothing,” said Maloney. “He will just have to let the will of Congress go through. One of the changes is that UNFPA will be funded,” CNSNews.com reports.

The Bush administration in 2002 had stopped funding the organization, citing the Kemp-Kasten Amendment which prohibits funds from being available to organizations or programs determined to be supporting or participating in coercive abortion or involuntary sterilization programs.

In July of 2008, Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte announced that for the sixth year in a row, the government had determined that “UNFPA provides support for and participates in the management of the Chinese government’s program of coercive abortion and involuntary sterilization.”

Rep. Maloney reported that she discusses UNFPA funding controversies in her book “Rumors of Our Progress are Greatly Exaggerated.” She said the UNFPA was founded “with American leadership” and “was supported strongly by George Bush’s father.”

The new UN report, “Reaching Common Ground: Culture, Gender and Human Rights,” calls for “cultural sensitivity” to “mitigate and overcome cultural resistance to couples and individuals using modern contraception.” It claims to prepare for the empowerment of women with control over their fertility.

Nevertheless, Rep. Maloney claimed the U.S. will no longer “impose our own ideology” under the UNFPA funding changes.

She said Obama “has already said his administration will change the way we do business in Washington and that improving the role of women around the world is going to be one of his prominent priorities.

“I am thrilled with this report, and I am really thrilled at the new direction of our government,” Maloney said, according to CNSNews.com.



Global RSS
Comments
I always knew that this is where the whole abortion equation was heading. This is where we are heading in this country, too. It's easy to dupe someone into supporting something even if it is heinous. You just have to reframe the whole thing to look like people are being attacked or made victim by being denied X (insert abomination here). Dupe people to choose X until they are entrenched in X and then make it mandatory. Voilla, suckers. A govt. that makes up rights that oppose God's Laws think THEY are gods. They don't care about what is right or about your "rights" just what is right for them and a lot of you sacrificed your children, (y)our future on the alter of indignance/ convenience. A crime against humanity and God can never be a right, silly.

by WOW | Monday, November 17, 2008  8:56:27 PM

if they have no consciense in murdering babies, they'll kill you too !!!

http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=goldieshome&view=videos

goldieshouse.piczo.com

by rich | Sunday, November 16, 2008  3:06:23 PM

Liberalism is a twisted mental disorder.

Same creeps who say we are racists for wanting an end to illegal immigration in US approve of funding forced abortion and say its a good thing for womens' rights? thats a mentally ill position.

I am for retroactive abortion for people who think like Carolyn Baloney and Barack the baby killer.

by TDPro | Sunday, November 16, 2008  12:52:08 PM

It's one thing for our government to support the killing of millions of babies each year by abortion but for me to be forced to pay for abortions in foreign countries is flat out wrong. American's should not be required to pay for something they believe is wrong.


by Dr_Moon | Sunday, November 16, 2008  12:13:30 PM

Carolyn Maloney and Obama see no problem in funding in part the Chinese forced abortion policies. Why is it considered progressive to not just tolerate but pay for women to be violated by foreign government or UN agencies? There is a huge gulf separating education and access to contraception and government mandated abortion. One honors individual choice, the other violates that choice in the extreme.

Supporting the UNPF has nothing to do with supporting women's reproductive rights in China. It has to do with a totalitarian government imposing its will and violating the rights of women for what they have determined is the common good. Millions of babies are killed and women violated in China every year. Why does the American taxpayer have the obligation to fund this? This is not progressive, it is reactionary in the very worst of ways; leaving a woman with no rights or choice about the use of her body.

by Melinda | Sunday, November 16, 2008  12:56:31 AM

Your E-mail Address:

Privacy Statement
 


© Copyright Spero, All rights reserved. RSS
Spero News on Twitter
Submit a tip
Advertise
Terms of use
Privacy Policy
Contact
This page took 0.1563seconds to load