The impulse to accede to political pressure and jobs blackmail from the Big Three for a $25 billion bailout offers America a historic turning-point opportunity. This is the country’s chance to both reform the auto industry and ignite a massive shift off of oil in one master stroke. How?
The $25 billion in lending should not go to the Big Three as a reward for consciously addicting this country to oil and subverting the alternatives. A better idea is to allocate the same $25 billion in lending—but not to the Big Three. Instead, offer loans at rates as low as student loans to any American citizen or fleet manager willing to buy an alternative fuel, flex-fuel, open fuel standard, or alternative propulsion vehicle--new or retrofitted. This would provide an immediate incentive for Detroit and Torrance, California to spend the approximate $100 per vehicle necessary to make every car and truck a multi-fuel or open-fuel vehicle.
When we say open-fuel or multi-fuel, we are not talking about the governmental cash cow currently going to the corn ethanol-big oil combine. We are talking about fuel systems that can function on all forms of combustibles from methanol (the Chinese use 50 million gallons a year while we use none) to second generation biofuel such as cellulosic ethanol. There is already pending legislation advocating the open-fuel standard and the multi-fuel approach. Why wait?
At the same time, legislation should immediately eliminate the $.54 per gallon penalty tax assessed to every gallon of sugar cane ethanol that Brazil struggles to export to America’s Southeast. In the process, we should cut the $8 billion in government subsidies annually handed to the corn ethanol-big oil combine and use that money to both fund 25 percent of the bailout money and open a string of multi-fuel service stations throughout the country offering everything from compressed natural gas (CNG) to methanol to hydrogen to electric charging.
Washington can also use a portion of that $25 billion to fund surge production of alternative fuels and propulsion from trash-to-gas to hydrogen to electric. Dozens of small companies are waiting to implement their ideas or expand beyond their mom-and-pop operations into regional or national purveyors.
Who should investigate General Motors' bailout?
Some of those billions can also fund Big Three transition to open-fuel or multi-fuel vehicles. The cost is about $100 per vehicle. About 1.5 million vehicles are produced monthly in the United States. Carmakers can be paid by the vehicle.
If Washington funds the purchase of alternative fuel and alternative propulsion vehicles and fuels, and mandates their use, the Big Three automakers will scrap their plans for sexed-up gas guzzlers and start producing and retrofitting the non-oil vehicles the entire nation needs.
Fund the public, not the problem. Help the country, not the corporations.
If all this sounds like a Manhattan Project, it should. The proposed Big Three bailout is $25 billion. The World War II Manhattan Project, in today’s money, only spent $22 billion.
Edwin Black is the editor of The Cutting Edge News and author of The Plan: How to Rescue Society the Day the Oil Stops--or the Day Before.


RSS
Not to mention the cost and effort required to retrain and re-equip the ENTIRE automotive service industry, re-equip the factories, not to mention perfect the technologies themselves and implement the infrastructure into the commonplace.
GM estimated the cost at $20 Billion just to install Hydrogen fuel stations across the country. That's 80% of $25 Billion dollars JUST to install the fuel stations to service the cars that haven't been built yet, haven't trained anyone to fix and haven't been produced or sold.