Diverging US, EU drug strategies in Afghanistan

Hoping to stem burgeoning narcotics production and trafficking in Afghanistan, the Bush administration has established a "drug czar" for the country.

Article Tools

The creation of the drug czar post, formally known as the Coordinator of Counter-Narcotics and Justice Reform in Afghanistan, was announced in late March. For Schweich, his new responsibilities do not seem to differ much from his former job - principal deputy assistant secretary in the Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement at the State Department.

In recent months, members of Congress and US policy analysts urged the administration to improve coordination of US anti-drug efforts in Afghanistan. Existing US programs, according to many inside the Beltway, are failing to curb narcotics cultivation and exports, and thus are helping to fan the Taliban insurgency and raise the threat of spreading instability across Central Asia. In a letter sent to Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Defense Secretary Robert Gates, members of Congress blamed inter-agency rivalries and the lack of close international coordination for the failing anti-drug efforts.

According to the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, total poppy production in Afghanistan increased by 49 percent in 2006, and accounted for about 90 percent of the global opium supply. Since the ouster of the Taliban from power in Kabul in late 2001, the area under poppy cultivation has risen from roughly 8,000 hectares to an estimated 165,000 hectares.

Much of the expansion has occurred in the country's southern provinces, which have experienced a revival of the Taliban insurgency Zalmai Afzali, a spokesman for Afghanistan's Ministry of Counter Narcotics, has admitted publicly that the expected record opium harvest this year is a likely harbinger of more aggressive action by the Taliban. In addition, Afghan drug trafficking helps to reinforce local warlords and criminal organizations at the expense of the already weak central government of President Hamid Karzai.

Many on Capitol Hill had hoped for the appointment of a higher-profile drug czar, rather than Schweich, who is seen as a diplomat with comparatively little experience and authority. Only a widely known individual with abundant prestige would possess the level of influence needed to compel various government agencies to cooperate on anti-drug measures, members of Congress indicated in their letter.

Schweich has set the ambitious goal of doubling the number of provinces free from opium production by the end of this year from the existing six to 12. At the same time, he acknowledged that expected progress in northern Afghanistan could be offset by increased opium production in southern Afghanistan. It will take a minimum of five years to turn the corner on eradication efforts in southern Afghanistan, he added.

Representatives of the NATO-led International Security Assistance Force claim that the Taliban has been trafficking in drugs in order to fund recruitment and training efforts. Other analysts accuse Afghan civil servants, police, and army personnel of accepting bribes to allow the cultivation and shipment of narcotics. This rampant corruption has limited the ability of the Karzai government to implement an effective anti-narcotics program.

Among the main challenges facing Schweich are: promoting a reduction of narcotics-related corruption within the Afghan bureaucracy; improving coordination among US and Afghan government agencies; managing relations between the Bush administration and a Democrat-controlled Congress; and fostering improved cooperation between the United States and EU on a regional anti-drug program.

At present, tension is hampering joint US-Afghan action. The Bush administration favors aerial spraying as an eradication technique, and views the Afghan government's preferred method - beating the heads of the poppy plants with sticks - as ineffective and inefficient. The UN Office on Drugs and Crime reports that crop destruction has been disproportionately directed towards poor farmers who lack assets and influenc

The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author only, not of Spero News.
Add to Newsvine Add to Facebook Add to Digg Add to Twitter Add to DeliciousAdd to PropellerAdd to TechnoratiAdd to StumbleUponAdd to FurlAdd to BlinklistAdd to FarkAdd to Reddit
Filed under
Society and Culture RSS
Comments
Your E-mail Address:

Privacy Statement
 


© Copyright Spero, All rights reserved. RSS
Spero News on Twitter
Submit a tip
Advertise
Terms of use
Privacy Policy
Contact
This page took 0.1250seconds to load