I recently visited the World War II museum in New Orleans and was struck by the following description of the U.S. bombing of Japan:
On March 9-10, 1945, bombs incinerated 16 square miles and killed 100,000 civilians. In April, bombs destroyed 180 square miles, killed 300,000 people, and left 8.5 million people homeless. Throughout the war, the United States resisted bombing civilian areas. But with time, attitudes hardened. What once became unthinkable became a deliberate policy.
American history should be kept in mind when reports are issued about the behavior of Israeli forces during the war in Gaza with Hamas. Given this context, ask yourself what America would do if its cities were bombarded by 10,000 rockets and mortars over the course of three years. Do you think the response would be proportional?
Israeli soldiers at a staging area near Israel’s border with the Gaza Strip, in southern Israel, Tuesday, December 30, 2008. Palestinians had sent a barrage of missiles deep into Israel the day before.
The amount of destruction and the number of casualties was tragic in Gaza. It pales in comparison, of course, to what America and its allies did during World War II. In fact, never in history has an army gone to such great lengths to avoid the loss of innocent life as Israeli forces did during the recent Operation Cast Lead.
Palestinians were warned to evacuate buildings where weapons were stored or where tunnels were dug and to avoid interaction with terrorists. Roughly 1 million leaflets were dropped during the operation throughout the entire Gaza Strip. Thousands of phone calls were placed to Palestinians advising them to leave areas that were to be attacked. Radio announcements were made as well. Minutes before the targeted killing of a Hamas terrorist in his apartment or home, all the neighbors get a phone call warning them to get out of the area. Some of the defiant ones go to the roof hoping to dissuade the IDF from firing at which point a small, harmless missile is fired to a corner of the roof. This convinces the defiant to get away. Then and only then is the hit performed.
Imagine another army giving up the element of surprise, effectively telling the bad guys, “Hide, we’re about to attack you,” in the interest of ensuring that innocent people around them were not harmed.
Predictably, Hamas used the media to convey their message, that they were fighting heroically and that Israel was indiscriminately killing innocent women and children. Too often the media cooperated and failed to verify what they were being told by Palestinian health officials whose jobs depended on the goodwill of Hamas, and UN representatives with little or no firsthand knowledge and histories of anti-Israel animus. Thus, for example, in one of the most notorious cases the UN accused Israel of attacking a UN school full of innocent people who sought shelter in the building. Later, we learned that Israel’s denials were correct and that forces did not attack the school and that they had returned fire after being shot at by terrorists in the area of the school.
Inflated casualty figures were sent to the press along with claims that nearly all of the dead were noncombatants. As in the case of the war with Hezbollah, however, when that terrorist group did not acknowledge that any of its fighters were killed, Hamas sought to hide its losses. While still gathering information, Israeli investigators have now identified most of the dead and concluded that the majority were associated with Hamas or one of the other terror groups. Of course, not a single Palestinian would have been hurt if Hamas had not attacked Israel.
Listening to the reaction of critics to Israel’s actions in Gaza, I’m reminded of a letter to “My dear Israel,” written by Michael Frayne after the 1967 War:
“I have felt obliged to condemn your unseemly haste in opening hostilities [and] our insistence on winning the war – particularly in such a brash and violent fashion….To insist upon defeating your opponents is a discourtesy which they may find very hard to forgive….What makes your behavior all the more perplexing is that when the war commenced you enjoyed the approval and sympathy of polite society as a whole. There you stood, surrounded on all sides by greatly superior hostile forces, whose proclaimed intention was to destroy you utterly. Everybody was deeply touched. We shouldn’t have let you down. If things had gone badly, we had ships standing by which could have evacuated several thousand Israeli survivors – who would have had the unreserved sympathy of the entire world.”
More than 40 years later, Israel still has the audacity to care more about the safety of its citizens, for whom the world showed no interest during the three years of Hamas rocket bombardment, than world opinion. It is the price Israelis have learned to pay for their survival in a bad neighborhood.
Mitchell Bard writes for The Cutting Edge News and is the director of the Jewish Virtual Library. His latest book is Will Israel Survive? (Palgrave).