Deadly mix. Why? For one thing, it’s a “deadly mix” to combine our broken health-care system and assisted suicide, which would instantly become the cheapest treatment. Direct coercion is not even necessary. If insurers deny, or even merely delay, expensive, life-sustaining treatment, patients are steered toward hastening their deaths. Do we think insurers will do the right thing, or the cheap thing?
This applies to private and public insurers alike. Barbara Wagner and Randy Stroup, Oregonians with cancer, were both informed by the Oregon Health Plan that the Plan wouldn’t pay for a prescribed chemotherapy, but would pay for their assisted suicide. Though called a free choice, for these patients, it would have been a phony form of freedom.
And remember that Oregon is largely white. California’s diverse communities – particularly those of Latinos and African Americans - unfortunately face much larger disparities in health care than those found in Oregon. An even more deadly mix.
Danger of abuse
Elder abuse is a rising problem, and abuse of people with disabilities as well. This policy is a recipe for abuse. Where assisted suicide is legal, an heir (someone who stands to inherit from the ill person) or abusive caregiver can steer someone towards it, witness the request, pick up the lethal dose, and even give the drug -- no objective witnesses are required at the death, so who would know?
This Committee’s analysis acknowledges there have been documented abuses.
When proponents claim that there have been no abuses in Oregon, let us remember Kate Cheney. Let us remember Michael Freeland, with a history of depression and suicide attempts, who was prescribed lethal drugs. Let us remember Wendy Melcher. And Linda Fleming and Thomas Middleton, whose cases showed economic pressures and financial abuse. These are just some of the cases we know about; what about those that have gone unreported? More on those individuals in a moment.
There is a legal solution today for end-of-life pain
Importantly, anyone dying in discomfort that is not otherwise relievable, may legally now, receive palliative sedation, wherein the patient is sedated to the point where the discomfort is relieved while the dying process takes place. So we already have a legal solution to any uncomfortable deaths that does not endanger others the way an assisted suicide law does.
The supposed ”safeguards” in this bill are utterly hollow
“6 months to live” is intended to keep everyone else safe. But in fact, misdiagnosis and incorrect prognosis of terminal illness, common in medicine, has deadly consequences if assisted suicide is legal.
Jeanette Hall, diagnosed with cancer and given six months to a year to live, sought to die under Oregon’s law. Her doctor persuaded her to fight the disease, and she is alive and well nearly 15 years later, and grateful to be.
John Norton was diagnosed with ALS at age 18 and given 3-5 years to live. Six years later, the progression of his disease suddenly stopped and he is alive at age 77, with a wife, children, and retired from a successful career. He stated that if assisted suicide had been legal at the time, he would have used it, but is so grateful to be alive.
And, Doctor-shopping gets around any of the hollow safeguards in this bill.
That’s when, if you ask for lethal drugs and your doctor says no, you don’t qualify; you or your family shops for another doctor who will say “yes.” That’s what happened to Kate Cheney, age 85. Although a psychiatrist concluded that she had dementia and was being pressured by her daughter, she died after taking the suicide prescription.
Did you know that the overwhelming majority of reported Oregon deaths under its law were facilitated in some way by Compassion & Choices, formerly Compassion in Dying, and earlier, known as the Hemlock Society? They can refer you to a doctor if yours says no.
And, family pressures, whether financial or emotional, which distort patient choice, can also get around any safeguard. Let’s look at just one aspect of this, economic factors. Two stories:
1. Economic pressure: Linda Fleming. The first to use the Washington State law, was divorced, had had financial problems, had been unable to work due to a disability, and was forced to declare bankruptcy. Yet the Director of Compassion & Choices of Washington said that her situation presented "none of the red flags" that might have given his group pause in supporting her request for death. Yet we are told by proponents that financial pressures have never played a role.
2. Financial abuse: Thomas Middleton was diagnosed with Lou Gehrig’s disease, moved into the home of Tami Sawyer in July 2008, and died by assisted suicide later that very month. Thomas Middleton had named Tami Sawyer his estate trustee and put his home in her trust. Two days after he died, Tami Sawyer listed the property for sale and deposited $90,000 into her own account. It took a federal investigation into real estate fraud to expose this abuse. Tami Sawyer was indicted for first- degree criminal mistreatment and first-degree aggravated theft, partly over criminal mistreatment of Thomas Middleton. But the Oregon state agency responsible for the assisted suicide law never even noticed.
And, Good faith. While it creates two new felonies, the bill would also protect anyone who acts in, quote, “good faith.” It is virtually impossible to disprove an allegation of one’s own good faith, making all other safeguards effectively unenforceable.
Oregon model is characterized by the lack of oversight or monitoring; and by secrecy, not transparency
The minimal published statistical data, derived from asking prescribing doctors a few questions, looks fine on the surface. But this data does not reflect what’s actually happening. It’s not what the data shows – it’s what the data fails to show. There is no investigation for abuse. The data shows no abuses because the system is set up not to find them. The State of Oregon readily admits they have no funding nor authority to investigate anything. SB 128 is the same.
One example of the lack of transparency: under SB 128, doctors are required to falsify death certificates, stating as the cause of death the underlying illness rather than the lethal prescription—even if the person takes the lethal drugs during a week or month when they have no symptoms of their disease! This hides the ball, making accurate data impossible to collect.
While proponents deny evidence of suicide contagion, Oregon’s suicide rate, since it legalized AS, has climbed much faster than the national average. According to the Centers for Disease Control, the increase was 49 percent for Oregon versus 28 percent nationally. [for people age 35-64 from 1999 through 2010]
Let us remember that for LGBT teenagers and bullied disabled young people, assisted suicide sends the dangerous message that, “my death” is “my choice.”
Bills nearly identical to this one have been rejected over 140 times in 25 U.S. states. In the last year, bills were defeated in 7 states including Colorado, Massachusetts, and Connecticut. Already in 2015, since Brittany Maynard’s case was publicized, it was defeated in 4 states.
[Full list, 2014 and so far in 2015: Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Connecticut in late 2014; Colorado, Montana, Wyoming, and Utah so far in 2015.]
When lawmakers see the fine print, the dangers and problems, these bills are rejected.
Assisted suicide is bad medicine for California. Please oppose this risky, reckless bill.
Marilyn Golden is a Senior Policy Analyst with the Disability Rights Education & Defense Fund, a leading US law and policy center on disability civil rights. She writes for MercatorNet, from whence this article is adapted. The above article is testimony submitted to the California State Senate Health Committee in March on the assisted suicide bill SB 128. A supplementary anaylsis of the effects on uninsured and underinsured Californians is here.